The link between the mixed and fixed linear models revisited

被引：0
作者：
S. J. Haslett
S. Puntanen
B. Arendacká
机构：
[1] Massey University,Institute of Fundamental Sciences
[2] University of Tampere,School of Information Sciences
[3] Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt,undefined
来源：
Statistical Papers | 2015年 / 56卷
关键词：
Best linear unbiased estimator; Best linear unbiased predictor; Linear mixed model; Linear fixed effect model ; Henderson’s mixed model equation; 62J05; 62J10;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Haslett and Puntanen (Stat Pap 51:465–475, 2010) studied the links between the linear mixed model and a particular extended linear model including only fixed effects. This paper is a follow-up article to that paper clarifying some central concepts appearing therein and allowing the random effect and error term to be correlated. We also show an interesting connection between the big extended model with fixed effects and a particular mixed model obtained by transforming the extended model.
引用
收藏
页码：849 / 861
页数：12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Baksalary JK(1992)A study of the influence of the “natural restrictions” on estimation problems in the singular Gauss-Markov model J Stat Plan Inf 31 335-351
[2]  
Rao CR(2004)The general Gauss–Markov model with possibly singular dispersion matrix Stat Pap 45 311-336
[3]  
Markiewicz A(2010)Equality of BLUEs or BLUPs under two linear models using stochastic restrictions Stat Pap 51 465-475
[4]  
Groß J(1950)Estimation of genetic parameters Ann Math Stat 21 309-310
[5]  
Haslett SJ(1959)The estimation of environmental and genetic trends from records subject to culling Biometrics 15 192-218
[6]  
Puntanen S(1990)Some notes on design sensitivity to changes in covariance structure Util Math 3 13-27
[7]  
Henderson CR(2006)Linear prediction sufficiency for new observations in the general Gauss-Markov model Commun Stat Theory Methods 35 1011-1023
[8]  
Henderson CR(2013)Equality of the BLUPs under the mixed linear model when random components and errors are correlated J Multivar Anal 116 297-309
[9]  
Kempthorne O(1991)That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects (discussion: pp. 32–51) Stat Sci 6 15-51
[10]  
Searle SR(1967)On canonical forms, non-negative covariance matrices and best and simple least squares linear estimators in linear models Ann Math Stat 38 1092-1109
12