Amplitude spectral area of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation success at low energy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

被引:0
作者
Francesca R. Gentile
Lars Wik
Iraia Isasi
Enrico Baldi
Elisabete Aramendi
Jon Erik Steen-Hansen
Alessandro Fasolino
Sara Compagnoni
Enrico Contri
Alessandra Palo
Roberto Primi
Sara Bendotti
Alessia Currao
Federico Quilico
Luca Vicini Scajola
Clara Lopiano
Simone Savastano
机构
[1] Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo,Division of Cardiology
[2] University of Pavia,Division of Prehospital Emergency Medicine
[3] Oslo University Hospital,Prehospital Clinic, Doctor car
[4] National Service of Competence for Prehospital Acute Medicine (NAKOS),BioRes Group
[5] Ullevål Hospital,Division of Prehospital Care
[6] Oslo University Hospital HF,undefined
[7] Ullevål Hospital,undefined
[8] University of the Basque Country,undefined
[9] Vestfold Hospital Trust,undefined
[10] AAT 118 Pavia,undefined
[11] Agenzia Regionale Urgenza Emergenza at Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo,undefined
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2023年 / 18卷
关键词
Cardiac arrest; AMSA; Ventricular fibrillation; Defibrillation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The optimal energy for defibrillation has not yet been identified and very often the maximum energy is delivered. We sought to assess whether amplitude spectral area (AMSA) of ventricular fibrillation (VF) could predict low energy level defibrillation success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. This is a multicentre international study based on retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included all OHCAs with at least one manual defibrillation. AMSA values were calculated by analyzing the data collected by the monitors/defibrillators used in the field (Corpuls 3 and Lifepak 12/15) and using a 2-s-pre-shock electrocardiogram interval. We run two different analyses dividing the shocks into three tertiles (T1, T2, T3) based on AMSA values. 629 OHCAs were included and 2095 shocks delivered (energy ranging from 100 to 360 J; median 200 J). Both in the “extremes analysis” and in the “by site analysis”, the AMSA values of the effective shocks at low energy were significantly higher than those at high energy (p = 0.01). The likelihood of shock success increased significantly from the lowest to the highest tertile. After correction for age, call to shock time, use of mechanical CPR, presence of bystander CPR, sex and energy level, high AMSA value was directly associated with the probability of shock success [T2 vs T1 OR 3.8 (95% CI 2.5–6) p < 0.001; T3 vs T1 OR 12.7 (95% CI 8.2–19.2), p < 0.001]. AMSA values are associated with the probability of low-energy shock success so that they could guide energy optimization in shockable cardiac arrest patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2397 / 2405
页数:8
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Orton RH(1954)Electrical defibrillation of the heart Med J Aust 41 331-1383
[2]  
Eisenberg MS(1980)Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with rapid defibrillation by emergency medical technicians N Engl J Med 302 1379-1847
[3]  
Copass MK(1991)Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "Chain of Survival" concept of survival Circulation 83 1832-243
[4]  
Hallstrom AP(2001)Optimal response to cardiac arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects Resuscitation 49 233-496
[5]  
Blake B(2009)Comparison of neurological outcomes following witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation defibrillated with either biphasic or monophasic automated external defibrillators Emerg Med J 26 492-1517
[6]  
Bergner L(2007)BIPHASIC trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Circulation 115 1511-151
[7]  
Short FACL(2020)Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care Circulation 161 115-70
[8]  
Cummins R(2021)European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support Resuscitation 59 59-232
[9]  
Ornato JP(2003)Do clinically relevant transthoracic defibrillation energies cause myocardial damage and dysfunction? Resuscitation 43 225-822
[10]  
Thies WH(1979)Cardiac damage produced by direct current countershock applied to the heart Am J Cardiol 34 815-688