Assessing coastal landscape vulnerability using geospatial techniques along Vizianagaram–Srikakulam coast of Andhra Pradesh, India

被引:0
作者
Meenu Rani
Sufia Rehman
Haroon Sajjad
B. S. Chaudhary
Jyoti Sharma
Sandeep Bhardwaj
Pavan Kumar
机构
[1] G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development,Centre for Land and Water Resource Management (CLWRM)
[2] Jamia Millia Islamia,Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural Sciences
[3] Kurukshetra University,Department of Geophysics
[4] Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS),Marine and Atmospheric Science Department (MASD)
[5] Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO),Department of Earthquake Engineering
[6] Indian Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2018年 / 94卷
关键词
Coastal vulnerability index; Shoreline change; Erosion and accretion; Geospatial techniques;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Vizianagaram–Srikakulam coastal shoreline consisting of beaches, mangrove swamps, tidal channel and mudflats is one of the vulnerable coasts in Andhra Pradesh, India. Five site-specific parameters, namely rate of geomorphology, coastal elevation, coastal slope, shoreline change and mean significant wave height, were chosen for constructing coastal vulnerability index and assessing coastal landscape vulnerability. The findings revealed a shift of 2.5 km in shoreline towards the land surface because of constant erosion and that of 1.82 km towards the sea due to accretion during 1997–2017. The rate of high erosion was found in zones IV and V, and high accretion was found in zones II and III. Coastal vulnerability index analysis revealed constant erosion along shoreline and sea level rise in the study area. Most of the coast in zone V has recorded very high vulnerability due to erosion, high slope, significant wave height and sea level rise. Erosion and accretion, significant wave height, sea level rise and slope are attributed to high vulnerability in zones III and IV. Zone II recorded moderate vulnerability. Relatively lower slope, mean sea wave height and sea level rise have made this zone moderately vulnerable. Very low vulnerability was found in zone I, and low vulnerability was recorded in zone II. Accretion, low slope and low sea level rise were found to be causative factors of lower vulnerability. Thus, zones III, IV and V should be accorded higher priorities for coastal management. The findings can be helpful in coastal land planning and management and preparing emergency plans of the coastal ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 725
页数:14
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [1] Alves FL(2013)Integrated coastal zone management (ICZM): a review of progress in Portuguese implementation J Reg Environ Change 13 1031-1042
  • [2] Sousa LP(2014)Application of the Coastal Hazard Wheel methodology for coastal multi-hazard assessment and management in the state of Djibouti Clim Risk Manag 3 79-95
  • [3] Almodovar M(2001)Distributed process modelling for regional assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise Environ Modell Assess 6 57-65
  • [4] Phillips MR(1997)Climate change and the management of coastal resources Clim Res 9 47-56
  • [5] Appelquist LR(2016)Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood Nat Hazard 81 1549-1568
  • [6] Balstrøm T(2001)Distributed process modeling for regional assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise Environ Model Assess 6 57-65
  • [7] Belperio T(2017)Understanding coastal change using shoreline trend analysis supported by cluster-based segmentation Geomorphology 282 131-149
  • [8] Bourman B(2005)Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards Nat Hazards Rev 1 23-33
  • [9] Bryan B(2015)Geophysical, socio-demographic characteristics and perception of flood vulnerability in Accra, Ghana Nat Hazards 77 787-804
  • [10] Harvey N(2011)An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management Nat Hazards 59 167-189