Techno-economic model-based design space exploration of ‘combined’ ship propulsion systems

被引:0
作者
Amit Batra
Suresh Sampath
Theoklis Nikolaidis
Pericles Pilidis
机构
[1] Cranfield University,Propulsion Engineering Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing
来源
Journal of Marine Science and Technology | 2023年 / 28卷
关键词
Ship propulsion system design; Design space exploration; Model-based design; Techno-economic & Environmental Risk Assessment (TERA); Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Analytic Network Process (ANP); Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL); DANP; VIKOR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The architecture of a ship propulsion system, developed during early stages of the overall ship design process, has a very large impact on the overall design and performance of the ship. The design space exploration to arrive at the final ship propulsion architecture can be a rather complex process for high-performance 'combined' ship propulsion systems designed to achieve multiple, often conflicting, design objectives. This paper proposes a novel process for the process of design space exploration based on a model-based ‘Techno-economic & Environmental Risk Assessment’ (TERA) approach, executed using a hybrid ‘Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making’ (MCDM) procedure, to select a compromise solution from competing propulsion system architectures populating the design space. The process utilizes a combination of performance data generated from performance simulation of developed models, as well as comparative expert opinions-based metrics for information not available early in the ship design process for selection of a 'compromise solution'. The paper includes an illustrative example of application of the proposed process for design space exploration for a combined propulsion system architecture for a notional destroyer.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 313
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Brown A(2004)Risk metric for multi-objective design of naval ships Nav Eng J 116 55-72
[2]  
Mierzwicki T(2003)Multiple-objective optimization in naval ship design Nav Eng J 115 49-62
[3]  
Brown A(2011)A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP Int J Hosp Manag 30 908-932
[4]  
Salcedo J(2012)Techno-economic and environmental risk analysis for advanced marine propulsion systems Appl Energy 99 1-12
[5]  
Chen FH(2020)Developments, trends, and challenges in optimization of ship energy systems Appl Sci 2020 4639-1020
[6]  
Hsu TS(2018)Recent developments and trends in optimization of energy systems Energy 164 1011-366
[7]  
Tzeng GH(2016)An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP Expert Syst Appl 46 346-141
[8]  
Doulgeris G(2015)Multi-criteria selection and thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle system for a marine application Int J Thermodyn 18 133-1157
[9]  
Korakianitis T(2004)Energy, economy and environment as objectives in multi-criterion optimization of thermal systems design Energy 29 1139-18
[10]  
Pilidis P(2015)Multi-objective decision support to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: a review and future directions Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 78 3-571