Equilibrium analysis in multi-echelon supply chain with multi-dimensional utilities of inertial players

被引:2
作者
Panchal G. [1 ]
Jain V. [2 ]
Cheikhrouhou N. [3 ]
Gurtner M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Logistics Institute - Asia Pacific, National University of Singapore, 21, Heng Mui Keng Terrace, #04-01, Singapore
[2] School of Management, Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, Pipitea Campus, 23 Lambton Quay, Wellington
[3] Geneva School of Business Administration, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland HES-SO, Rue de la Tambourine, Carouge, Geneva
[4] Laboratory for Production Management and Processes, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne
关键词
dyadic supply chain relationship; revenue management; supply chain coordination; supply chain formation; supply chain player behavior;
D O I
10.1057/s41272-017-0094-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a supply chain, the importance of information elicitation from the supply chain players is vital to design supply chain network. The rationality and self-centredness of these players causes the information asymmetry in the supply chain and thus situation of conflict and non-participation of the players in the network design process. In such situations, it is required to analyse the supply chain players' behaviour in order to explore potential for coordination through incentives. In this paper, a novel approach of social utility analysis is proposed to elicit the information for supply chain coordination among the supply chain players in a dyadic relationship - supplier and buyer. In principal, we consider a monopsony situation where buyer is a dominant player. With the objective of maximizing the social utility, efforts have been made to value behavioural issues in supply chain. On the other hand, the reluctance of player due to the information asymmetry is measured in the form of inertia - an offset to the supply chain profit. The suppliers' behaviour is analysed with three distinct level of risk for two types of the product in procurement process. The useful insight from this paper is in supplier selection process where the reluctance of supplier offsets supply chain profit. The paper provides recommendations to supply chain managers for efficient decision-making ability in supplier selection process. © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 436
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Beil D.R., Wein L.M., An inverse-optimizationbased auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process, Management Science, 49, 11, pp. 1529-1545, (2003)
  • [2] Cachon G.P., Swinney R., Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers, Management Science, 55, 3, pp. 497-511, (2009)
  • [3] Che Y., Design competition through multidimensional auctions, RAND Journal of Economics, 24, pp. 668-680, (1993)
  • [4] Chiang W.Y.K., Chhajed D., Hess J.D., Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dualchannel supply-chain design, Management Science, 49, 1, pp. 1-20, (2003)
  • [5] Cho S.H., McCardle K.F., Tang C.S., Optimal pricing and rebate strategies in a two-level supply chain, Production and Operations Management, 18, 4, pp. 426-446, (2009)
  • [6] He X., Prasad A., Sethi S.P., Cooperative advertising and pricing in a dynamic stochastic supply chain: Feedback Stackelberg strategies, Production and Operations Management, 18, 1, pp. 78-94, (2009)
  • [7] Hobbs B.F., Pang J.S., Nash-Cournot equilibria in electric power markets with piecewise linear demand functions and joint constraints, Operations Research, 55, 1, pp. 113-127, (2007)
  • [8] Hu Q., Schwarz L.B., Uhan N.A., The impact of group purchasing organizations on healthcare-product supply chains, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 14, 1, pp. 7-23, (2012)
  • [9] Jain V., Deshmukh S.G., Dynamic supply chain modeling using a new fuzzy hybrid negotiation mechanism, International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 1, pp. 319-328, (2009)
  • [10] Jain V., Panchal G.B., Kumar S., Universal supplier selection via multi-dimensional auction mechanisms for twoway competition in oligopoly market of supply chain, Omega, 47, pp. 127-137, (2014)