A Spatial Connectivity Approach to Landscapes of Conflict: Julius Caesar and the Assault to Puig Ciutat (NE Iberian Peninsula)

被引:0
作者
Xavier Rubio-Campillo
Eduard Ble
Àngels Pujol
Roger Sala
Robert Tamba
机构
[1] Universitat de Barcelona,Department de Didàctiques Aplicades
[2] University of Edinburgh,School of History, Classics and Archaeology
[3] Universitat de Barcelona,Departament d’Història i Arqueologia
[4] GIRA Association,undefined
[5] SOT Archaeological Prospection,undefined
来源
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Conflict archaeology; Landscape archaeology; Spatial analysis; Julius Caesar; Computational archaeology; Ilerda;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landscape plays a vital role in the development of military campaigns through the definition of geostrategic landmarks that structure the control of the territory, the imposition of constraints to the movement of armies and the identification of features that facilitate defence against attackers. These factors are linked to the study of past spatial mobility which is typically done by finding optimal pathways between pairs of points using Least-Cost Path analysis. This emphasis on optimality may not be ideal for case studies that need a general approach to spatial connectivity such as the study of conflict-related dynamics. Connectivity modelling based on Circuit Theory (CT) is an alternative approach to spatial mobility that captures the connectivity of an entire region identifying not only optimal paths but also bottlenecks, dead-ends and any other spatial feature that may impact movement. We present here a framework to study landscapes of conflict using connectivity modelling; the framework combines CT, visibility analysis and statistical hypothesis testing to understand the reasons behind the assault and destruction of Puig Ciutat (NE Iberian Peninsula) during Julius Caesar’s civil war. Results suggest that the site exerted decisive control over a highly connected area linking two possible logistical bases (Emporion and Massalia) to the armies fighting at Ilerda (49 BC).
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1089
页数:30
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [11] Moreno MI(2014)A review of case studies in archaeological least-cost analysis Archeologia e Calcolatori 25 223-810
  • [12] Bleed P(2011)Multiple pathways across past landscapes: Circuit Theory as a complementary geospatial method to Least Cost Path for modeling past movement Journal of Archaeological Science 38 2523-217
  • [13] Scott DD(2007)Modeling visibility through vegetation International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 799-2724
  • [14] Canosa-Betés J(2007)Zigzagging: Theoretical insights on climbing strategies Journal of Theoretical Biology 249 206-52
  • [15] Dickson BG(2008)Using Circuit Theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution and conservation Ecology 89 2712-56
  • [16] Albano CM(2020)Constructing the archaeology of the Roman conquest of Journal of Roman Archaeology 33 36-124
  • [17] Anantharaman R(2009): New evidence, perspectives and challenges International Journal of Heritage Studies 15 44-122
  • [18] Beier P(2018)Resonant materiality and violent remembering: Archaeology, memory and bombing Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 17 111-198
  • [19] Fargione J(2012)Visibility analysis of the Roman communication network in southern Scotland Trabajos de Prehistoria 69 103-104
  • [20] Graves TA(1971)Understanding human movement through spatial technologies. The role of natural areas of transit in the Late Prehistory of South-western Iberia Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte, H. 2/3 196-120