A Spatial Connectivity Approach to Landscapes of Conflict: Julius Caesar and the Assault to Puig Ciutat (NE Iberian Peninsula)

被引:0
作者
Xavier Rubio-Campillo
Eduard Ble
Àngels Pujol
Roger Sala
Robert Tamba
机构
[1] Universitat de Barcelona,Department de Didàctiques Aplicades
[2] University of Edinburgh,School of History, Classics and Archaeology
[3] Universitat de Barcelona,Departament d’Història i Arqueologia
[4] GIRA Association,undefined
[5] SOT Archaeological Prospection,undefined
来源
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Conflict archaeology; Landscape archaeology; Spatial analysis; Julius Caesar; Computational archaeology; Ilerda;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landscape plays a vital role in the development of military campaigns through the definition of geostrategic landmarks that structure the control of the territory, the imposition of constraints to the movement of armies and the identification of features that facilitate defence against attackers. These factors are linked to the study of past spatial mobility which is typically done by finding optimal pathways between pairs of points using Least-Cost Path analysis. This emphasis on optimality may not be ideal for case studies that need a general approach to spatial connectivity such as the study of conflict-related dynamics. Connectivity modelling based on Circuit Theory (CT) is an alternative approach to spatial mobility that captures the connectivity of an entire region identifying not only optimal paths but also bottlenecks, dead-ends and any other spatial feature that may impact movement. We present here a framework to study landscapes of conflict using connectivity modelling; the framework combines CT, visibility analysis and statistical hypothesis testing to understand the reasons behind the assault and destruction of Puig Ciutat (NE Iberian Peninsula) during Julius Caesar’s civil war. Results suggest that the site exerted decisive control over a highly connected area linking two possible logistical bases (Emporion and Massalia) to the armies fighting at Ilerda (49 BC).
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1089
页数:30
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Anantharaman R(2020)Circuitscape in Julia: High performance connectivity modelling to support conservation decisions Proceedings of the JuliaCon Conferences 1 58-104
  • [2] Hall K(2002)Tracking the Samnites: Landscape and communications routes in the Sangro Valley, Italy American Journal of Archaeology 106 169-64
  • [3] Shah VB(2016)An archaeological analysis of a battlefield of the Second Punic War: The camps of the battle of Baecula Journal of Roman Archaeology 29 73-426
  • [4] Edelman A(2011)Contexts for conflict: Conceptual tools for interpreting archaeological reflections of warfare Journal of Conflict Archaeology 6 42-249
  • [5] Bell T(2016)Border surveillance: Testing the territorial control of the Andalusian defense network in center-south Iberia through GIS Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 9 416-43
  • [6] Wilson A(2019)Circuit-Theory applications to connectivity science and conservation Conservation Biology 33 239-714
  • [7] Wickham A(2003)Battlefields Landscapes 4 5-44
  • [8] Bellón JP(2010)Resultats preliminars de la primera campanya d’excavació al jaciment de Puig Ciutat (Oristà, Osona) Ausa 24 685-27
  • [9] Rueda C(2015)“Dotting the joins”: A non-reconstructive use of Least Cost Paths to approach ancient roads. The case of the Roman roads in the NW Iberian Peninsula Journal of Archaeological Science 54 31-239
  • [10] Lechuga MÁ(2019)Forgotten pilots, airfields and aircraft: A transdisciplinary approach to the memory of the republican air force during the Spanish Civil War (1936–39) Public Archaeology 18 3-2535