Are “Internet+” tactics the key to poverty alleviation in China’s rural ethnic minority areas? Empirical evidence from Sichuan Province

被引:0
作者
Xiang Yin
Zhiyi Meng
Xin Yi
Yong Wang
Xia Hua
机构
[1] Sichuan University,Institute of South Asia Studies
[2] Sichuan University,School of Business
[3] Sichuan University,School of Economics
[4] Southwest University of Finance and Economics,School of Securities and Futures
来源
Financial Innovation | / 7卷
关键词
Poverty alleviation; “Internet+” Tactics; Rural ethnic minority areas; Empirical analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China has made great efforts to alleviate poverty in rural ethnic minority areas and targeted achieving the poverty-alleviation task by the end of 2020. Aba, Ganzi, and Liangshan, three of the poorest ethnic prefectures in Sichuan Province, Southwest China, have all implemented “Internet+” tactics since 2013, which have had the positive effect of increasing family revenues by improving communication infrastructure and encouraging the large-scale use of e-commerce. This paper aims to comprehensively investigate whether “Internet+” tactics play a key role in poverty alleviation in Sichuan’s rural ethnic minority areas and to propose further measures to enhance the efficiency of e-commerce practice. To this end, we conduct an analysis using the framework of classic growth theory and use panel data from 2000 to 2018 to examine the relationship between Communication Infrastructure Investment (CII) and a set of poverty-alleviation indicators, including local GDP growth rate (LGGR), local government revenue (LGR), and per-capita income of residents (PCIR). The results indicate that strengthening CII improves the PCIR and local economic growth, playing a key role in poverty alleviation. However, the stimulation of CII on LGGR and LGR wanes as time passes. More financial and technical actions will be needed to improve the efficiency and quality of current strategies for sustainable development in those areas.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D(2014)Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing Am Econ Rev 104 394-399
[2]  
Dorn D(2010)Human capital and ICT per capital contribution to East Asian productivity growth Int Regional Sci Rev 85 40-55
[3]  
Hanson GH(2016)Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: assessing the current evidence World Dev 79 177-196
[4]  
Price B(2018)Credit margin of investment in the agricultural sector and credit fungibility: the case of smallholders of district Shikarpur, Sindh, Pakistan Financ Innov 4 27-74
[5]  
Ahmed EM(2020)Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: an application in financial inclusion Eur J Oper Res 73 55-723
[6]  
Béné C(2004)Financial development and economic growth: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests J Dev Econ 23 703-21
[7]  
Arthur R(2005)Monitoring the diversity of the poverty outreach and impact of microfinance: a comparison of methods using data from Peru Dev Policy Rev 26 3-35
[8]  
Norbury H(2017)Tactics, resource orchestration and e-commerce enabled social innovation in Rural China J Strategic Inf Syst 13 19-305
[9]  
Allison EH(1999)Are financial deepening and economics causally related? Another look at the evidence Int Econ J 285 296-336
[10]  
Beveridge M(2020)Dynamic VAR model-based control charts for batch process monitoring Eur J Oper Res 71 306-678