Setting standards for medical writing in orthopaedics

被引:0
作者
Cyril Mauffrey
Marius M. Scarlat
Marko Pećina
机构
[1] University of Colorado,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Denver Health Medical Center
[2] School of Medicine,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[3] Clinique Chirurgical St Michel,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[4] School of Medicine University of Zagreb,undefined
来源
International Orthopaedics | 2014年 / 38卷
关键词
Medical writing; Publication; Notoriety; How to get published; Standards to write a paper; Research; Methodology; How to write a paper; Medical publication; Medical editing; Orthopaedic surgery; Academic orthopaedic surgery; Reference; Impact factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Once the privilege of few clinical scholars in the field of orthopaedics, medical writing has become a must for career advancement. The number of papers submitted and published yearly has increased steadily, and with the development of the Internet, manuscript and journals have become easily accessible. Medical writing has risen to become a discipline in itself, with rules and standards. However, heterogeneity in the quality of papers submitted still prevails, with large variations in both form and content. With countries such as China and India submitting an exponential number of manuscripts, it is important and helpful that standards of medical writing be emphasised to help writers who do not always have the required support to produce an outstanding manuscript. In this paper, we summarise what may become standards for medical writing in the field of orthopaedics.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Larsen PO(2010)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index Scientometrics 84 575-603
  • [2] Von Ins M(2010)Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission Surg 147 475-480
  • [3] Søreide K(2007)Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7 16-484
  • [4] Winter DC(2012)Steps in the undertaking of a systematic review in orthopaedic surgery Int Orthop 36 477-3
  • [5] Schardt C(2011)Analysis of performance metrics reporting in papers comparing treatments or materials/devices in four important orthopaedic journals for the year 2009 Injury 42 1480-2007
  • [6] Adams M(2001)CONSORT revised—improving the reporting of randomized trials JAMA 285 2006-745
  • [7] Owens T(2004)One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 743-undefined
  • [8] Sambunjak D(2009)Fraudulent submissions Int Orthop 33 299-undefined
  • [9] Franic M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Bowles RJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined