Corruption, regulation, and growth: an empirical study of the United States

被引:0
作者
Noel D. Johnson
William Ruger
Jason Sorens
Steven Yamarik
机构
[1] George Mason University,Department of Economics
[2] Texas State University,Department of Political Science
[3] Dartmouth College,Department of Government
[4] California State University,Department of Economics
来源
Economics of Governance | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
Corruption; US states; Growth; Regulation; K4; O1; H7; H0; D7;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigates whether the costs of corruption are conditional on the extent of government intervention in the economy. We use data on corruption convictions and economic growth between 1975 and 2007 across the US states to test this hypothesis. Although no state approaches the level of government intervention found in many developing countries, we still find evidence for the “weak” form of the grease-the-wheels hypothesis. While corruption is never good for growth, its harmful effects are smaller in states with more regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 69
页数:18
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Ades A(1999)Rents, competition, and corruption Am Econ Rev 89 982-993
  • [2] di Tella R(2003)Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government J Law Econ Organ 19 445-490
  • [3] Adsera A(2010)Regulation and distrust Q J Econ 125 1015-1049
  • [4] Boix C(2009)Corruption, institutions, and economic development Oxf Rev Econ Policy 25 271-291
  • [5] Payne M(2008)Political and judicial checks on corruption: evidence from american state governments Econ Politics 20 33-61
  • [6] Aghion P(1992)Convergence J Political Econ 100 223-251
  • [7] Algan Y(1998)Gross state product by industry, 1977–1996 Surv Curr Bus 78 15-37
  • [8] Cahuc P(2003)Political institutions and policy choices: evidence from the United States J Econ Lit 41 7-73
  • [9] Shleifer A(2003)Measuring public corruption in the american states: a survey of state house reporters State Politics Policy Q 3 420-438
  • [10] Aidt TS(2006)Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses Political Anal 14 63-82