Rural out-migration and resource-dependent communities in Mexico and India

被引:0
作者
James P. Robson
Prateep K. Nayak
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Centre for Community
[2] Harvard University,Based Resource Management, Natural Resources Institute
来源
Population and Environment | 2010年 / 32卷
关键词
Out-migration; Demographic and cultural change; Institutions; Oaxaca; Orissa; Resource practice; Biodiversity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Resource regimes are complex social–ecological systems that operate at multiple levels. Using data from two distinct cultural and environmental contexts (Mexico and India), this paper looks at the susceptibility and response of such regimes to rural out-migration. As a driver of demographic and cultural change, out-migration impacts both the practices and institutional arrangements that define territorial resource use and management. The research shows that critical yet poorly recognised shifts in migration dynamics can increase the pressures felt locally and serve to reduce the effectiveness of institutional adaptations at the community level. From an environmental perspective, the research adds to the body of work examining the impacts of rural depopulation on land and seascapes and associated biological diversity. We question the assumption that rural–urban migration necessarily simulates ecosystem recovery and aids conservation. This finding is timely as funding agencies and government programs show belated interest in the consequences of out-migration for environmental management, resource use and rural livelihoods in tropical country settings.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 284
页数:21
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Adger NW(2002)Migration, remittances, livelihood trajectories, and social resilience Ambio 31 358-366
  • [2] Mick Kelly P(1999)Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of ‘community’ in natural resource conservation World Development 27 629-649
  • [3] Winkels AL(2001)Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: Political ecologies of globalization Ecumene 8 369-380
  • [4] Huy Q(2009)Revising the commons paradigm Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 1 261-264
  • [5] Locke C(2005)Remittance outcomes and migration: Theoretical contests, real opportunities Studies in Comparative International Development 40 88-112
  • [6] Agrawal A(2009)The deepest cut: Political ecology in the dredging of a new sea mouth in Chilika Lake, Orissa, India Conservation and Society 7 192-204
  • [7] Gibson C(2005)Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30 441-473
  • [8] Bebbington AJ(2007)Are rural–urban migration and sustainable development compatible in mountain systems? Mountain Research & Development 27 119-123
  • [9] Batterbury SPJ(2001)Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems Ecosystems 4 390-405
  • [10] Berkes F(2004)Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come Educational Researcher 33 14-26