A cooperative demand-response framework for day-ahead optimization in battery pools

被引:0
作者
Chasparis G.C. [1 ]
Pichler M. [1 ]
Spreitzhofer J. [2 ]
Esterl T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Software Competence Center Hagenberg GmbH, Softwarepark 21, Hagenberg
[2] AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 2, Vienna
关键词
Aggregation; Day-ahead spot market; Demand-response; Reinforcement learning;
D O I
10.1186/s42162-019-0087-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The constantly increasing electricity and energy demand in residential buildings, as well as the need for higher absorption rates of renewable sources of energy, demand for an increased flexibility at the end-users. This need is further reinforced by the rising numbers of residential Photovoltaic (PV) and battery-storage systems. In this case, flexibility can be viewed as the excess energy that can be charged to or discharged from a battery, in response to a group objective of several such battery-storage systems (aggregation). One such group objective considered in this paper includes marketing flexibility (charging or discharging) to the Day-ahead (DA) spot market, which can provide both a) financial incentives to the owners of such systems, and b) an increase in the overall absorption rates of renewable energy. The responsible agent for marketing and offering such flexibility, herein aggregator, is directly controlling the participating batteries, in exchange to some financial compensation of the owners of these batteries. In this paper, we present an optimization framework that allows the aggregator to optimally exchange the available flexibility to the DA market. The proposed scheme is based upon a reinforcement-learning approach, according to which the aggregator learns through time an optimal policy for bidding flexibility to the DA market. By design, the proposed scheme is flexible enough to accommodate the possibility of erroneous forecasts (of weather, load or electricity price). Finally, we evaluate our approach on real-world data collected from currently installed battery-storage systems in Upper Austria. © 2019, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Bertsekas D., Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control. 2nd edn, (2000)
[2]  
Bertsekas D., Tsitsiklis J., Neuro-Dynamic Programming, (1996)
[3]  
Chasparis G., Pichler M., Natschlager T., A Demand-Response Framework in Balance Groups through Direct Battery-Storage Control In, 18Th European Control Conference, pp. 1392-1397, (2019)
[4]  
Chen C., Wang J., Kishore S., A Distributed Direct Load Control Approach for Large-Scale Residential Demand Response, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 29, 5, pp. 2219-2228, (2014)
[5]  
Ruiz N., Cobelo I., Oyarzabal J., A Direct Load Control Model for Virtual Power Plant Management, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24, 2, pp. 959-966, (2009)
[6]  
Gomez-Villalva E., Ramos A., Optimal energy management of an industrial consumer in liberalized markets, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 18, 2, pp. 716-723, (2003)
[7]  
Herter K., Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity, Energy Policy, 35, 4, pp. 2121-2130, (2007)
[8]  
He G., Chen Q., Kang C., Pinson P., Xia Q., Optimal Bidding Strategy of Battery Storage in Power Markets Considering Performance-Based Regulation and Battery Cycle Life, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 7, 5, pp. 2359-2367, (2016)
[9]  
Iria J.P., Soares F.J., Matos M.A., Trading small prosumers flexibility in the day-ahead energy market, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1-5, (2017)
[10]  
Jiang D.R., Powell W.B., Optimal Hour-Ahead Bidding in the Real-Time Electricity Market with Battery Storage Using Approximate Dynamic Programming, INFORMS J Comput, 27, 3, pp. 525-543, (2015)