Monitoring and Evaluation of Substance Abuse Services in South Africa: Implications for Policy and Practice

被引:0
作者
Bronwyn Myers
Nadine Harker Burnhams
Nuraan Fakier
机构
[1] Medical Research Council,Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Unit
来源
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction | 2010年 / 8卷
关键词
Outcomes monitoring; Substance abuse; Programme evaluation; Service quality; South Africa;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although outcomes monitoring and the collection of other performance data holds benefits for service managers and policy makers, the extent to which these data are collected by South African substance abuse service providers is unknown. To describe (i) the extent to which substance abuse service providers in South Africa monitor and evaluate their programmes and (ii) the availability of structures to support monitoring and evaluation activities within these services. Cross-sectional surveys of substance abuse treatment services were conducted in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal provinces (2006–2007) and the Central and Northern region of the country (2007–2008). A survey of prevention services was conducted in the Cape Town metropole (2008). Across all sites approximately half of the services reported never having evaluated their programmes. In addition, less than two thirds of treatment facilities routinely monitor client outcomes. Even where monitoring and evaluation did occur, less than a third of facilities used standardised questionnaires and less than two-thirds used urinalyses to collect outcomes data. Based on the above findings, a number of recommendations are made to expand monitoring and evaluation within South African substance abuse services.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 565
页数:8
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Atkinson DD(2005)A participatory approach to building capacity of treatment programs to engage in evaluation Evaluation and Program Planning 28 329-334
  • [2] Wilson M(2000)What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent progress and outcomes? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 31 70-74
  • [3] Avula D(2003)Rationales, obstacles, and strategies for local outcome monitoring systems in substance abuse treatment settings Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 24 31-42
  • [4] Bickman L(2000)Comparison of patient self-reports and urinalysis results obtained under naturalistic methadone treatment conditions Drug and Alcohol Dependence 59 43-49
  • [5] Rosof-Williams J(2003)An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders Evaluation and Program Planning 26 339-352
  • [6] Salzer MS(2002)Establishing the feasibility of performance measures for alcohol and drugs Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 23 375-385
  • [7] Summerfelt WT(2007)Are Washington Circle performance measures associated with decreased criminal activity following treatment? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 341-52
  • [8] Noser K(2009)Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 36 252-264
  • [9] Wilson SJ(2007)Veterans Affairs facility performance on Washington Circle indicators and casemix-adjusted effectiveness Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 333-339
  • [10] Brown TG(2001)Outcomes monitoring in Minnesota: treatment implications, practical limitations Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 21 173-183