Clinical application of a fixed reference line in the ultrasound quantitative diagnosis of female pelvic organ prolapse

[1] Haylen BT(2016)An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) Int Urogynecol J 27 1655-84

[2] Maher CF(2002)Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 1160-6

[3] Barber MD(1996)The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction [J] Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 10-7

[4] Camargo S(2003)Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the american Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct –1 1-1

[5] Dandolu V(2021)International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse Int Urogynecol J 32 2011-9

[6] Digesu A(2014)Imaging of slings and meshes Australas J Ultrasound Med 17 61-71

[7] Hendrix SL(2019)SRU.AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of urogynecological ultrasound examinations: developed in collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and theSRU J Ultrasound Med 38 851-64

[8] Clark A(2016)Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of ‘normal pelvic organ support’ Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 47 363-8

[9] Nygaard I(2012)Accuracy of assessing pelvic organ prolapse quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organprolapse Int Urogynecol J 23 1555-60

[10] Bump RC(2009)Kluivers KB. A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks Int Urogynecol J 20 721-9

[1] Haylen BT(2016)An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) Int Urogynecol J 27 1655-84

[2] Maher CF(2002)Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 1160-6

[3] Barber MD(1996)The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction [J] Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 10-7

[4] Camargo S(2003)Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the american Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct –1 1-1

[5] Dandolu V(2021)International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse Int Urogynecol J 32 2011-9

[6] Digesu A(2014)Imaging of slings and meshes Australas J Ultrasound Med 17 61-71

[7] Hendrix SL(2019)SRU.AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of urogynecological ultrasound examinations: developed in collaboration with the ACR, the AUGS, the AUA, and theSRU J Ultrasound Med 38 851-64

[8] Clark A(2016)Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of ‘normal pelvic organ support’ Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 47 363-8

[9] Nygaard I(2012)Accuracy of assessing pelvic organ prolapse quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organprolapse Int Urogynecol J 23 1555-60

[10] Bump RC(2009)Kluivers KB. A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks Int Urogynecol J 20 721-9