Assessing Economic and Shared Social Values of Forest Conservation to Improve Water Availability: A Case Study of the Protected Forest Reserve of El Quinini, Colombia

被引:0
作者
Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros
Diana Marcela Sabogal-Aguilar
Liz F. Villarraga-Flórez
机构
[1] Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua,Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología
[2] Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas,Maestría en Manejo, Uso y Conservación del Bosque
[3] Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas,Facultad del , Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales
来源
Small-scale Forestry | 2022年 / 21卷
关键词
Ecosystem services; Shared values; Participatory mapping; Contingent valuation; Deliberative decision making; Forest governance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most of the rural population of developing countries depends on forest ecosystems; consequently, there is a myriad of trade-offs that jeopardize the ability of the forest to produce goods and services. To maintain the current forest cover and offer opportunities to improve rural livelihoods, more attention has been paid to the development of strategies to assess the plurality of values associated with ecosystem services. Stated preference methods have served to asses non-market values of ecosystem goods and services; nevertheless, they have been criticized for their inability to reflect social values and the limited stakeholder´s participation in the selection of attributes for valuation. The aim of this study was to asses shared social values associated with water provision to further integrate them as attributes for contingent valuation. The study was conducted in a small community in central Colombia. Shared social values, the values held in common by forest owners, were assessed through application of problem tree and participatory mapping techniques; and the willingness to pay method was used for economic valuation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 459
页数:22
相关论文
共 143 条
  • [1] Acharya RP(2019)Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation—an analysis of publications Ecosyst Serv 39 100979-240
  • [2] Maraseni T(2013)Factors affecting public participation in river ecosystem restoration: using the contingent valuation method J Devel Areas 47 223-53
  • [3] Cockfield G(2018)Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: a taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods Environ Values 27 29-456
  • [4] Alam K(2014)Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: a case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States Ecol Econ 107 447-580
  • [5] Arias-Arévalo P(2018)Sustainable forest management using decision theaters: Rethinking participatory planning J Clean Prod 179 567-97
  • [6] Gómez-Baggethun E(2015)What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review Ecosyst Serv 14 88-293
  • [7] Martín-López B(2016)Opportunities for advances in climate change economics Target carbon’s costs, policy designs, and developing countries Science 352 292-486
  • [8] Pérez-Rincón M(2017)Social perceptions of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Amazon Human Ecol 45 475-477
  • [9] Armatas CA(2011)The governance of climate change: evaluating the governance quality and legitimacy of the United Nations’ REDD-plus programme Int J Climate Change Impacts Responses 2 124-11
  • [10] Venn TJ(2011)Island villagers’ willingness to work or pay for sustainability of a marine fishery reserve: Case of San Miguel island, Philippines Coast Manag 39 459-22