Comparison of haemodynamic- and electroencephalographic-monitored effects evoked by four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil, yielding a predicted tolerance to laryngoscopy of 90%

被引:0
作者
J. P. van den Berg
A. R. Absalom
A. M. Venema
A. F. Kalmar
K. Van Amsterdam
L. N. Hannivoort
J. H. Proost
S. Meier
T. W. L. Scheeren
M. M. R. F. Struys
H. E. M. Vereecke
机构
[1] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Anesthesiology
[2] University of Groningen,Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences
[3] Ghent University,Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation
[4] AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2021年 / 35卷
关键词
Pharmacology; Interaction; Haemodynamic monitoring; Electroencephalographic monitoring;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This prospective study evaluates haemodynamic and electroencephalographic effects observed when administering four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol (CePROP) and remifentanil (CeREMI), all yielding a single predicted probability of tolerance of laryngoscopy of 90% (PTOL = 90%) according to the Bouillon interaction model. We aimed to identify combinations of CePROP and CeREMI along a single isobole of PTOL that result in favourable hypnotic and haemodynamic conditions. This knowledge could be of advantage in the development of drug advisory monitoring technology. 80 patients (18–90 years of age, ASA I–III) were randomized into four groups and titrated towards CePROP (Schnider model, ug⋅ml−1) and CeREMI (Minto model, ng⋅ml−1) of respectively 8.6 and 1, 5.9 and 2, 3.6 and 4 and 2.0 and 8. After eleven minutes of equilibration, baseline measurements of haemodynamic endpoints and bispectral index were compared with three minutes of responsiveness measurements after laryngoscopy. Before laryngoscopy, bispectral index differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between groups in concordance with CePROP. Heart rate decreased with increasing CeREMI (p = 0.001). The haemodynamic and arousal responses evoked by laryngoscopy were not significantly different between groups, but CePROP = 3.6 μg⋅ml−1 and CeREMI = 4 ng⋅ml−1 evoked the lowest median value for ∆HR and ∆SAP after laryngoscopy. This study provides clinical insight on the haemodynamic and hypnotic consequences, when a model based predicted PTOL is used as a target for combined effect-site controlled target- controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Heart rate and bispectral index were significantly different between groups despite a theoretical equipotency for PTOL, suggesting that each component of the anaesthetic state (immobility, analgesia, and hypnotic drug effect) should be considered as independent neurophysiological and pharmacological phenomena. However, claims of (in)accuracy of the predicted PTOL must be considered preliminary because larger numbers of observations are required for that goal.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 825
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] van den Berg JP(2017)Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anaesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anaesthetic drug administration Br J Anaesth 118 44-57
  • [2] Vereecke HE(2002)Non-steady state analysis of the pharmacokinetic interaction between propofol and remifentanil Anesthesiology 97 1350-1362
  • [3] Proost JH(2004)Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy Anesthesiology 100 1353-1372
  • [4] Eleveld DJ(2008)Simulated drug administration: an emerging tool for teaching clinical pharmacology during anesthesiology training Clin Pharmacol Ther 84 170-174
  • [5] Wietasch JK(2003)Target-controlled infusions for intravenous anesthetics: surfing USA not! Anesthesiology 99 1039-1041
  • [6] Absalom AR(2019)Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia J Clin Monit Comput 33 959-23
  • [7] Struys MM(1997)Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil I Model development Anesthesiology 86 10-1182
  • [8] Bouillon T(1998)The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers Anesthesiology 88 1170-323
  • [9] Bruhn J(2012)Sevoflurane remifentanil interaction: comparison of different response surface models Anesthesiology 116 311-631
  • [10] Radu-Radulescu L(2016)Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil Br J Anaesth 116 624-458