Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Wu, Huiming [1 ]
Guo, Renkai [1 ]
Li, Huiyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci,Tongji Shanxi Hosp, Hosp 3,Dept Gen Surg, Taiyuan 030032, Peoples R China
关键词
Robot-assisted; Mid and low rectal cancer; Short-term efficacy; Long-term efficacy; Meta-analysis; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; LEARNING-CURVE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OUTCOMES; HYPE;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04579-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of robot-assisted laparoscopic treatment in patients with mid and low rectal cancer.Methods A comprehensive search strategy was employed to retrieve relevant literature from PubMed, NCBI, Medline, and Springer databases, spanning the database inception until August 2023. The focus of this systematic review was on controlled studies that compared the treatment outcomes of robot-assisted (Rob) and conventional laparoscopy (Lap) in the context of mid and low rectal cancer. Data extraction and literature review were meticulously conducted by two independent researchers (HMW and RKG). The synthesized data underwent rigorous analysis utilizing RevMan 5.4 software, adhering to established methodological standards in systematic reviews. The primary outcomes encompass perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes. Secondary outcomes include long-term outcomes.Result A total of 11 studies involving 2239 patients with mid and low rectal cancer were included (3 RCTs and 8 NRCTs); the Rob group consisted of 1111 cases, while the Lap group included 1128 cases. The Rob group exhibited less intraoperative bleeding (MD = -40.01, 95% CI: -57.61 to -22.42, P < 0.00001), a lower conversion rate to open surgery (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.82, P = 0.02), a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (MD = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.77 to 3.18, P = 0.001), and a lower CRM positive rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.95, P = 0.04). Additionally, the Rob group had lower postoperative morbidity rate (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.82, P < 0.0001) and a lower occurrence rate of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade >= 3 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.90, P = 0.02). Further subgroup analysis revealed a lower anastomotic leakage rate (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.97, P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the analysis of operation time (P = 0.42), occurrence rates of protective stoma (P = 0.81), PRM (P = 0.92), and DRM (P = 0.23), time to flatus (P = 0.18), time to liquid diet (P = 0.65), total hospital stay (P = 0.35), 3-year overall survival rate (P = 0.67), and 3-year disease-free survival rate (P = 0.42).Conclusion Robot-assisted laparoscopic treatment for mid and low rectal cancer yields favorable outcomes, demonstrating both efficacy and safety. In comparison to conventional laparoscopy, patients experience reduced intraoperative bleeding and a lower incidence of complications. Notably, the method achieves comparable short-term and long-term treatment results to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery, thus justifying its consideration for widespread clinical application.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer
    Baek, Se Jin
    AL-Asari, Sami
    Jeong, Duck Hyoun
    Hur, Hyuk
    Min, Byung Soh
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (11): : 4157 - 4163
  • [2] Attaining Surgical Competency and Its Implications in Surgical Clinical Trial Design: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Barrie, Jenifer
    Jayne, David G.
    Wright, Judy
    Murray, Carolyn J. Czoski
    Collinson, Fiona J.
    Pavitt, Sue H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 829 - 840
  • [3] Becker T, 2016, CHIRURG, V87, P567, DOI 10.1007/s00104-016-0220-3
  • [4] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Mid and Low Rectal Cancers
    Bedirli, Abdulkadir
    Salman, Bulent
    Yuksel, Osman
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2016, 20 (01)
  • [5] Robotic surgery for rectosigmoid junction tumor with ovarian metastases
    Bedirli, Abdulkadir
    Salman, Bulent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2015, 11 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [6] CLAVIEN PA, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P518
  • [7] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Feng, Qingyang
    Yuan, Weitang
    Li, Taiyuan
    Tang, Bo
    Jia, Baoqing
    Zhou, Yanbing
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhao, Ren
    Zhang, Cheng
    Cheng, Longwei
    Zhang, Xiaoqiao
    Liang, Fei
    He, Guodong
    Wei, Ye
    Xu, Jianmin
    [J]. LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 7 (11): : 991 - 1004
  • [8] Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis
    Feng, Qingyang
    Ng, Simon S. M.
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Songbin
    Niu, Zhengchuan
    Wei, Ye
    He, Guodong
    Chang, Wenju
    Zhu, Dexiang
    Xu, Jianmin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 124 (04) : 607 - 618
  • [9] Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery
    Feroci, Francesco
    Vannucchi, Andrea
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Cantafio, Stefano
    Garzi, Alessia
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Scatizzi, Marco
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (13) : 3602 - 3610
  • [10] Gladyshev D V, 2015, Vopr Onkol, V61, P937