Challenges to Build up a Collaborative Landscape Management (CLM)—Lessons from a Stakeholder Analysis in Germany

被引:0
作者
Jana Zscheischler
Maria Busse
Nico Heitepriem
机构
[1] Research Area Land Use and Governance,Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
[2] Technische Universität Berlin,Centre for Technology and Society (ZTG)
[3] UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Spreewald,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2019年 / 64卷
关键词
Integrated landscape approach; Transdisciplinary research; Tourism; Nature conservation; Cultural landscape; Land use conflict;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional cultural landscapes are of special value not only for reasons of nature conservation and high species diversity but also because they intersect with the identity of local communities, support recreation and tourism, and preserve cultural heritage. Structural changes in rural areas threaten these unique sceneries and environments in Europe and worldwide. As a result, the question of how to maintain and manage cultural landscapes where economic benefits are not assured has become a priority in science and in practice. Considering this context, community-based collaborative landscape management (CLM) can be considered an innovative and promising approach. This paper presents results from a stakeholder analysis examining the preconditions and opportunities for initiating a CLM in the biosphere reserve known as ‘Spreewald’. The results indicate that due to the type of problem (landscape change)—which is characterised by complexity, beneficial linkages to a multitude of actor groups, and broad problem awareness—CLM appears to be feasible. However, other preconditions related to social relationships among actor groups, questions of legitimate coordination and the collaborative capacity of the community are not met, thus reducing the likelihood of success. To address these challenges, we discuss the potential of transdisciplinary processes (TD) to assist local communities in establishing such a collaborative problem-solving and management approach. We show that TD is highly valuable and supportive during this critical stage of emerging collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 592
页数:12
相关论文
共 194 条
[21]  
Westley FR(2017)Ideal and reality of multi-stakeholder collaboration on sustainability problems: a case study on a large-scale industrial contamination in Phoenix, Arizona. Sustainability Science 12 123-936
[22]  
Carpenter SR(2005)Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems Annu Rev Environ Resour 30 441-936
[23]  
Bürgi M(2007)Environmental co-operatives as instruments for delivering across-farm environmental and rural policy objectives: lessons for the UK J Rural Stud 23 472-176
[24]  
Ali P(2016)Integrated landscape initiatives in Europe: multi-sector collaborationin multi-functional landscapes Land Use Policy 58 43-66
[25]  
Chowdhury A(1985)Conditions Facilitating Interorganizational Collaboration. Human Relations 38 911-530
[26]  
Heinimann A(1989)Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration Hum Relat 38 911-92
[27]  
Hett C(2004)Strong opposition: frame‐based resistance to collaboration J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14 166-2096
[28]  
Kienast F(2010)Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons Environ Manag 45 52-622
[29]  
Verburg PH(2018)Mutual learning between researchers and farmers during implementation of scientific principles for sustainable development: the case of biodiversity-based agriculture Sustain Sci 13 517-124
[30]  
Busse Maria(2016)Managing wicked natural resource problems: the collaborative challenge at regional scales in Australia Landsc Urban Plan 154 81-204