Challenges to Build up a Collaborative Landscape Management (CLM)—Lessons from a Stakeholder Analysis in Germany

被引:0
作者
Jana Zscheischler
Maria Busse
Nico Heitepriem
机构
[1] Research Area Land Use and Governance,Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
[2] Technische Universität Berlin,Centre for Technology and Society (ZTG)
[3] UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Spreewald,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2019年 / 64卷
关键词
Integrated landscape approach; Transdisciplinary research; Tourism; Nature conservation; Cultural landscape; Land use conflict;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional cultural landscapes are of special value not only for reasons of nature conservation and high species diversity but also because they intersect with the identity of local communities, support recreation and tourism, and preserve cultural heritage. Structural changes in rural areas threaten these unique sceneries and environments in Europe and worldwide. As a result, the question of how to maintain and manage cultural landscapes where economic benefits are not assured has become a priority in science and in practice. Considering this context, community-based collaborative landscape management (CLM) can be considered an innovative and promising approach. This paper presents results from a stakeholder analysis examining the preconditions and opportunities for initiating a CLM in the biosphere reserve known as ‘Spreewald’. The results indicate that due to the type of problem (landscape change)—which is characterised by complexity, beneficial linkages to a multitude of actor groups, and broad problem awareness—CLM appears to be feasible. However, other preconditions related to social relationships among actor groups, questions of legitimate coordination and the collaborative capacity of the community are not met, thus reducing the likelihood of success. To address these challenges, we discuss the potential of transdisciplinary processes (TD) to assist local communities in establishing such a collaborative problem-solving and management approach. We show that TD is highly valuable and supportive during this critical stage of emerging collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 592
页数:12
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]  
Agnoletti M(2014)Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective Landsc Urban Plan 126 66-73
[2]  
Almeida J(2018)Collaborative approach for tourism conflict management: a Portuguese case study Land Use Policy 75 166-179
[3]  
Costa C(1997)The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. the example of Flanders Region Landsc Urban Plan 38 105-117
[4]  
Nunes da Silva F(2006)Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landsc Urban Plan 75 187-197
[5]  
Antrop M(2008)Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. Journal of Rural and Community Development 3 56-75
[6]  
Antrop M(2014)Analysing how drivers of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies from Scandinavia, Iberia and Oceania Land Use Policy 36 60-72
[7]  
Beckley TM(1997)New and not-so-new directions in the use of the commons: co-management. The Common Property Resource Digest 42 5-7
[8]  
Martz D(2010)Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management Ecol Soc 15 9-689
[9]  
Nadeau S(2017)Integrated landscape approach: closing the gap between theory and application Sustainability 9 1371-62
[10]  
Wall E(2019)The Acceptability of Land Pools for the Sustainable Revalorisation of Wetland Meadows in the Spreewald Region, Germany Sustainability 11 4056-229