The plug method in inguinal hernia: Prospective evaluation of postoperative pain and disability

被引:0
|
作者
E. P. Pélissier
D. Blum
机构
[1] Chemin des Tilleroyes,Clinique Saint Vincent
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Tension-free hernioplasty; Mesh plug; Local anesthesia;
D O I
10.1007/BF01234756
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the postoperative pain and disability after treatment of inguinal hernia by the plug technique. Postoperative pain, main organic functions, mobility, return to normal activities and absence from work were prospectively assessed in 118 consecutive patients. Only 3 benign postoperative complications (2.5%) occurred. The mean postoperative pain as assessed by visual analogue scale was 20.3 ± 15.1 mm/100. The mean duration of analgesic consumption was 2.7 ± 1.6 days and the mean total number of capsules was 7.1 ± 4.7. The percentages of patients capable of eating lunch the day of operation, passing urine, walking and bending forward without difficulty 6 hours after operation were 97.5,97.4, 97.5 and 85.6 respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.2 ± 0.6 days. The mean times of first outdoor walking, return to normal activities and return to work were 1.5 ± 1, 3.6 ± 2.2 and 15.2 ± 8.9 days respectively. These results show that the plug technique provides a low complication rate, a low level of pain, and allows early resumption of full activity.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 189
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The plug method in inguinal hernia: A prospective evaluation
    Pélissier E.P.
    Blum D.
    Damas J.M.
    Marre P.
    Hernia, 1999, 3 (4) : 201 - 204
  • [3] Postoperative inguinal pain and disability after Lichtenstein versus ONSTEP hernia repair: analysis of responses to the inguinal pain questionnaire in Spanish
    Jorge Aguilar-García
    Rodrigo Villafuerte-Fernandez
    Perla I. Ntezes-Hidalgo
    Jose A. Meade-Aguilar
    Jose L. Ramirez-GarciaLuna
    Mario A. Martinez-Jimenez
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 703 - 712
  • [4] Postoperative inguinal pain and disability after Lichtenstein versus ONSTEP hernia repair: analysis of responses to the inguinal pain questionnaire in Spanish
    Aguilar-Garcia, Jorge
    Villafuerte-Fernandez, Rodrigo
    Ntezes-Hidalgo, Perla I.
    Meade-Aguilar, Jose A.
    Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose L.
    Martinez-Jimenez, Mario A.
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (05) : 703 - 712
  • [5] Assessment of postoperative pain and hospital discharge after inguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a prospective study
    Santos, Guilherme de Castro
    Braga, Gisela Magalhaes
    Queiroz, Fabio Lopes
    Navarro, Tulio Pinho
    Gomez, Renato Santiago
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 57 (05): : 545 - 549
  • [6] Predictors of Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain After Lichtenstein of Inguinal Hernia Repair
    Ding, Xiangyuan
    Yan, Siqi
    Liu, Junjie
    Huang, Hao
    Yan, Wei
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 86 (Suppl 2) : 385 - 391
  • [7] Postoperative comfort after plug-and-patch repair of recurrent inguinal hernia
    Zieren, J
    Neuss, H
    Philipp, AW
    Müller, JM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 168 (01) : 18 - 21
  • [8] Assessment of Three Distinct Approaches to Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, a Randomized Prospective Study
    Senol, Zafer
    Ertuerk, Tuna
    Cemel, Haron
    Yildirak, Kadir
    Yamac, Dilek Metin
    Kiziltoprak, Nurhilal
    Genc, Salih
    Isceviren, Bora
    Karaaslan, Atahan
    Calik, Gamze Ceylan
    Terzi, Elif Didem
    Karadag, Merve
    Guelec, Buelent
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (11): : 1021 - 1025
  • [9] Inguinal hernia:: obligatory indication for elective surgery?: A prospective assessment of quality of life before and after plug and patch inguinal hernia
    Zieren, J
    Küpper, F
    Paul, M
    Neuss, H
    Müller, JM
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 387 (11-12) : 417 - 420
  • [10] Inguinal hernia repair with the mesh plug method is safe after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Hiroaki Niitsu
    Junya Taomoto
    Koji Mita
    Masanori Yoshimitsu
    Yoichi Sugiyama
    Naoki Hirabayashi
    Wataru Takiyama
    Surgery Today, 2014, 44 : 897 - 901