Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations using artificial intelligence-based models and GMS

被引:0
作者
Khabat Star Mohammed
Saeid Shabanlou
Ahmad Rajabi
Fariborz Yosefvand
Mohammad Ali Izadbakhsh
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Water Engineering, Kermanshah Branch
来源
Applied Water Science | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
Groundwater level prediction; GMS; Hybrid models; ELM; ORELM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Groundwater level fluctuations are one of the main components of the hydrogeological cycle and one of the required variables for many water resources operation models. The numerical models can estimate groundwater level (GWL) based on extensive statistics and information and using complex equations in any area. But one of the most important challenges in analyzing and predicting groundwater depletion in water management is the lack of reliable and complete data. For this reason, the use of artificial intelligence models with high predictive accuracy and due to the need for less data is inevitable. In recent years, the use of different numerical models has been noticed as an efficient solution. These models are able to estimate groundwater levels in any region based on extensive statistics and information and also various field experiments such as pumping tests, geophysics, soil and land use maps, topography and slope data, different boundary conditions and complex equations. In the current research, first, by using available statistics, information and maps, the groundwater level fluctuations of the Sonqor plain are simulated by the GMS model, and the accuracy of the model is evaluated in two stages of calibration and validation. Then, due to the need for much less data volume in artificial intelligence-based methods, the GA-ANN and ICA-ANN hybrid methods and the ELM and ORELM models are utilized. The results display that the output of the ORELM model has the best fit with observed data with a correlation coefficient equal to 0.96, and it also has the best and closest scatter points around the 45 degrees line, and in this sense, it is considered as the most accurate model. To ensure the correct selection of the best model, the Taylor diagram is also used. The results demonstrate that the closest point to the reference point is related to the ORELM method. Therefore, to predict the groundwater level in the whole plain, instead of using the complex GMS model with a very large volume of data and also the very time-consuming process of calibration and verification, the ORELM model can be used with confidence. This approach greatly helps researchers to predict groundwater level variations in dry and wet years using artificial intelligence with high accuracy instead of numerical models with complex and time-consuming structures.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A new approach in using the GRACE satellite data and artificial intelligence models for modeling and predicting the groundwater level (case study: Aspas aquifer in Southern Iran) [J].
Maryam Shahbazi ;
Heidar Zarei ;
Abazar Solgi .
Environmental Earth Sciences, 2024, 83
[22]   Application of Artificial Intelligence-based predictive methods in Ionic liquid studies: A review [J].
Yusuf, Falola ;
Olayiwola, Teslim ;
Afagwu, Clement .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2021, 531
[23]   Ensemble based groundwater level prediction using neural network pattern fitting [J].
Kumar, Ajith S. ;
Vidhya, R. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF GEO-MARINE SCIENCES, 2020, 49 (01) :44-50
[24]   Development and application of hybrid artificial intelligence models for groundwater potential mapping and assessment [J].
Duong Hai Ha ;
Huong Thi Thanh Ngo ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Nguyen Duc Dam ;
Avand, Mohammadtaghi ;
Huu Duy Nguyen ;
Amiri, Mandis ;
Hiep Van Le ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Binh Thai Pham .
VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 44 (03) :410-429
[25]   An emerging intuitionistic fuzzy based groundwater level prediction [J].
Rani, R. ;
Elangovan, K. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF GEO-MARINE SCIENCES, 2017, 46 (06) :1213-1219
[26]   Groundwater-level prediction using multiple linear regression and artificial neural network techniques: a comparative assessment [J].
Sahoo, Sasmita ;
Jha, Madan K. .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 21 (08) :1865-1887
[27]   Enhancing Prediction Accuracy and Data Handling for Environmental Applications in Innovative Modeling of Groundwater Level Fluctuations Based on the Tree Ensembles Technique [J].
Chi, Duong Thi Kim ;
Thiem, Do Dac ;
Quynh, Trinh Thi Nhu ;
Nguyen, Thanh Q. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2025, 30 (04)
[28]   Forecasting groundwater level of Shahrood plain in Iran with stochastic and artificial neural network models [J].
Emamgholizadeh, S. ;
Rahimian, M. ;
Kiani, M. ;
Rekavandi, M. A. Naseri .
GROUNDWATER MODELING AND MANAGEMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY, 2012, :3-8
[29]   Groundwater Level Prediction Using SOM-RBFN Multisite Model [J].
Chen, Lu-Hsien ;
Chen, Ching-Tien ;
Pan, Yan-Gu .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (08) :624-631
[30]   Application of Artificial Intelligence Models for modeling Water Quality in Groundwater: Comprehensive Review, Evaluation and Future Trends [J].
Hanoon, Marwah Sattar ;
Ahmed, Ali Najah ;
Fai, Chow Ming ;
Birima, Ahmed H. ;
Razzaq, Arif ;
Sherif, Mohsen ;
Sefelnasr, Ahmed ;
El-Shafie, Ahmed .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2021, 232 (10)