Aortic root asymmetry in Marfan patients; evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with standard echocardiography

被引:0
|
作者
Lilian J. Meijboom
Maarten Groenink
Ernst E. van der Wall
Hans Romkes
Jaap Stoker
Barbara J.M. Mulder
机构
[1] Academic Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[2] Leiden University Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[3] Academic Medical Center,Department of Radiology
来源
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging | 2000年 / 16卷
关键词
aortic root; echocardiography; magnetic resonance imaging; Marfan syndrome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients with Marfan syndrome may develop aortic root dissection despite only mild aortic root dilation as shown by standard echocardiography, which may be due to aortic root asymmetry. Purpose of the present study was to investigate aortic root asymmetry by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with Marfan syndrome and to compare these measurements with standardly performed echocardiography. Methods: Eighty-seven Marfan patients (mean age 31 ± 8 years) underwent MR imaging. From this population, 15 patients (mean age 29 ± 3 years) were selected in whom both echocardiography and MR imaging had been performed within 3 months. With echocardiography, the aortic root was measured according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography. With MR imaging, a short axis view of the aortic root was obtained to measure distances between the noncoronary, right coronary and left coronary cusps and the aortic root area. Correlations between aortic root area and diameters were assessed, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) calculated. Results: No difference in the standardly measured noncoronary to right coronary cusp diameter between MR imaging and echocardiography was shown (42 ± 6 mm). Largest aortic root diameter on the MR images was the right to left coronary cusp diameter (46 ± 7 mm, p < 0.02). For a given noncoronary to right coronary cusp diameter, 95% confidence intervals revealed a variation of −20 to +20% in the aortic root area. Conclusions: The majority of Marfan patients show asymmetric dilation of the aortic root by MR imaging. This phenomenon may go unnoticed when standard echocardiography is performed. The asymmetry of the aortic root might be of clinical importance in unexpected aortic root dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prospective comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Ebstein’s anomaly
    Christine H. Attenhofer Jost
    Whitney D. Edmister
    Paul R. Julsrud
    Joseph A. Dearani
    M. Savas Tepe
    Carole A. Warnes
    Christopher G. Scott
    Nandan S. Anavekar
    Naser M. Ammash
    Heidi M. Connolly
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2012, 28 : 1147 - 1159
  • [22] Prospective comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Ebstein's anomaly
    Jost, Christine H. Attenhofer
    Edmister, Whitney D.
    Julsrud, Paul R.
    Dearani, Joseph A.
    Tepe, M. Savas
    Warnes, Carole A.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Anavekar, Nandan S.
    Ammash, Naser M.
    Connolly, Heidi M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 28 (05) : 1147 - 1159
  • [23] Comparison of echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of the athlete's heart
    Pluim, BM
    Beyerbacht, HP
    Chin, JC
    Zwinderman, A
    VanderLaarse, A
    DeRoos, A
    Vliegen, HW
    VanderWall, EE
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 18 (09) : 1505 - 1513
  • [24] Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Sirin, Selma
    Nassenstein, Kai
    Neudorf, Ulrich
    Jensen, Christoph J.
    Mikat, Christian
    Schlosser, Thomas
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [25] Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Selma Sirin
    Kai Nassenstein
    Ulrich Neudorf
    Christoph J. Jensen
    Christian Mikat
    Thomas Schlosser
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2014, 35 : 771 - 777
  • [26] Measurements in Pediatric Patients with Cardiomyopathies: Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography
    Zhang, Yuting
    He, Ling
    Cai, Jinhua
    Lv, Tiewei
    Yi, Qijian
    Xu, Yang
    Liu, Lingjuan
    Zhu, Jing
    Tian, Jie
    CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 131 (04) : 245 - 250
  • [27] Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance as an Alternate Method for Serial Evaluation of Proximal Aorta: Comparison with Echocardiography
    Bhatla, Puneet
    Nielsen, James C.
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2013, 30 (06): : 713 - 718
  • [28] Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation
    Reant, Patricia
    Lederlin, Mathieu
    Lafitte, Stephane
    Serri, Karim
    Montaudon, Michel
    Corneloup, Olivier
    Roudaut, Raymond
    Laurent, Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (02) : 276 - 283
  • [29] DIAGNOSIS OF THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING VERSUS TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    NIENABER, CA
    SPIELMANN, RP
    VONKODOLITSCH, Y
    SIGLOW, V
    PIEPHO, A
    JAUP, T
    NICOLAS, V
    WEBER, P
    TRIEBEL, HJ
    BLEIFELD, W
    CIRCULATION, 1992, 85 (02) : 434 - 447
  • [30] Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Koos, Ralf
    Altiok, Ertunc
    Mahnken, Andreas Horst
    Neizel, Mirja
    Dohmen, Guido
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Kuehl, Harald
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 158 (03) : 353 - 358