Effects of different isolation methods on the physicochemical properties of pea starch and textural properties of vermicelli

被引:0
|
作者
Qingjie Sun
Lijun Chu
Liu Xiong
Fumei Si
机构
[1] Qingdao Agricultural University,College of Food Science and Engineering
[2] Qingdao Agricultural University,School of Food Science and Engineering
来源
关键词
Different isolation methods; Pea starch; Physicochemical properties;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effects of different isolation methods including dry-milling (DM), sour liquid processing (SL), alkaline steeping (AS) and neutral protease isolation (NP) on pea starch physicochemical properties and textural properties of vermicelli were studied. The results showed that the pea starch isolated by DM had higher damaged starch content of 12.44 %. The starch isolated by NP showed the lowest SP and %SOL, while DM starch showed the highest. The AS starch showed higher PV, TV and FV than the other starches. The NP starch gel showed significantly lower hardness value than the other starch gel. The AS starch had higher To, Tp, Tc and endothermic enthalpy value than SL starch did. The vermicelli made from NP and SL starches had significantly lower CL and higher tensile strength, elongation at break, apparent modulus and fracture work. The result of the study implied that the vermicelli made from NP and SL starches had better quality than that made from DM and AS starches.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of chitooligosaccharide on the physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of Tofu
    Han, JS
    Kim, M
    JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES, 2002, 33 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [32] In vitro starch digestibility, pasting and textural properties of mung bean: effect of different processing methods
    Kaur, Maninder
    Sandhu, Kawaljit Singh
    Ahlawat, RavinderPal
    Sharma, Somesh
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 2015, 52 (03): : 1642 - 1648
  • [33] In vitro starch digestibility, pasting and textural properties of mung bean: effect of different processing methods
    Maninder Kaur
    Kawaljit Singh Sandhu
    RavinderPal Ahlawat
    Somesh Sharma
    Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2015, 52 : 1642 - 1648
  • [34] Physicochemical properties, structural properties, and in vitro digestibility of pea starch treated with high hydrostatic pressure
    Liu, Ming
    Wu, Na-Na
    Yu, Guo-Ping
    Zhai, Xiao-Tong
    Chen, Xue
    Zhang, Min
    Tian, Xiao-Hong
    Liu, Yan-Xiang
    Wang, Li-Ping
    Tan, Bin
    STARCH-STARKE, 2018, 70 (1-2):
  • [35] Effects of different modification methods on the physicochemical and rheological properties of Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.) starch
    Qian, Si-Yu
    Tang, Man-Qiu
    Gao, Qi
    Wang, Xiao-Wen
    Zhang, Jun-Wei
    Tanokura, Masaru
    Xue, You-Lin
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 116
  • [36] Physicochemical and textural properties of corn starch gels: Effect of mixing speed and time
    Alishahi, Afsaneh
    Farahnaky, Asgar
    Majzoobi, Mahsa
    Blanchard, Christopher L.
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2015, 45 : 55 - 62
  • [37] PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN CASSAVA STARCH AND FLOUR ASSOCIATED WITH FERMENTATION - EFFECT ON TEXTURAL PROPERTIES
    NUMFOR, FA
    WALTER, WM
    SCHWARTZ, SJ
    STARCH-STARKE, 1995, 47 (03): : 86 - 91
  • [38] Effects of trehalose on the physicochemical properties of rice starch
    Wang, Jianyu
    Feng, Xiaoguang
    Chang, Xiguang
    Zhou, Jing
    Liu, Huijun
    Zhang, Enze
    Chen, Xiangning
    International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 2020, 29 (01): : 324 - 330
  • [39] Physicochemical and textural properties of tartary buckwheat starch after heat-moisture treatment at different moisture levels
    Liu, Hang
    Lv, Manman
    Peng, Qiang
    Shan, Fang
    Wang, Min
    STARCH-STARKE, 2015, 67 (3-4): : 276 - 284
  • [40] Study on the physicochemical properties and invitro digestibility of starch from yam with different drying methods
    Chen, Xuetao
    Mao, Xinhui
    Jiang, Qianqian
    Wang, Tingting
    Li, Xia
    Gao, Wenyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 51 (08): : 1787 - 1792