Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Harshal S. Mandavdhare
M. Praveen Kumar
Dayakrishna Jha
Antriksh Kumar
Vishal Sharma
Pankaj Desai
Lada Shumkina
Pankaj Gupta
Harjeet Singh
Usha Dutta
机构
[1] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,Department of Gastroenterology
[2] Department of Pharmacology,Endoscopy Department
[3] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,Department of Radiodiagnosis
[4] Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences,Department of Surgery
[5] Moscow Clinical Science Centre Named By A.S. Loginov,undefined
[6] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,undefined
[7] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,undefined
来源
Esophagus | 2021年 / 18卷
关键词
Diverticulum; Esophagus; FESD; D-POEM; Success;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional way to tackle Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 450
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Indications, success, and adverse event rates of pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amirhossein Hosseini
    Mohammad Hassan Sohouli
    Elham Sharifi
    Aliakbar Sayyari
    Kannan Sridharan
    Saleheh Tajalli
    Negar Imanzadeh
    Somaye Fatahi
    BMC Pediatrics, 23
  • [32] Dental Implant Failure in Post-Menopausal Women on Oral Bisphosphonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pishan, Bahar
    Andrukhov, Oleh
    Rausch-Fan, Xiaohui
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2024, 50 (03) : 288 - 295
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization for infantile hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weil, Alexander G.
    Westwick, Harrison
    Wang, Shelly
    Alotaibi, Naif M.
    Elkaim, Lior
    Ibrahim, George M.
    Wang, Anthony C.
    Ariani, Rojine T.
    Crevier, Louis
    Myers, Bethany
    Fallah, Aria
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2016, 32 (11) : 2119 - 2131
  • [34] Comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without choroid plexus cauterization in pediatric hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ellenbogen, Yosef
    Brar, Karanbir
    Yang, Kaiyun
    Lee, Yung
    Ajani, Olufemi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2020, 26 (04) : 371 - 378
  • [35] No Evidence for Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lipka, Seth
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Richter, Joel E.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (06) : 1058 - +
  • [36] Hall technique for primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Shijia
    BaniHani, Alaa
    Nevitt, Sarah
    Maden, Michelle
    Santamaria, Ruth M.
    Albadri, Sondos
    JAPANESE DENTAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 58 : 286 - 297
  • [37] Systematic review and meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of POEM for achalasia
    Barbieri, Lavinia A.
    Hassan, Cesare
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Romario, Uberto Fumagalli
    Correale, Loredana
    Repici, Alessandro
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 3 (04) : 325 - 334
  • [38] Zirconia Implants as an Alternative to Titanium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elnayef, Basel
    Lazaro, Aida
    del Amo, Fernando Suarez-Lopez
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
    Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (03) : E125 - E134
  • [39] Effect of preoperative oral analgesics on pulpal anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shirvani, Armin
    Shamszadeh, Sayna
    Eghbal, Mohammad Jafar
    Marvasti, Laleh Alim
    Asgary, Saeed
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [40] Screening for head and neck second primary tumors in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van de Ven, S. E. M.
    Bugter, O.
    Hardillo, J. A.
    Bruno, M. J.
    de Jong, R. J. Baatenburg
    Koch, A. D.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (10) : 1304 - 1311