Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Harshal S. Mandavdhare
M. Praveen Kumar
Dayakrishna Jha
Antriksh Kumar
Vishal Sharma
Pankaj Desai
Lada Shumkina
Pankaj Gupta
Harjeet Singh
Usha Dutta
机构
[1] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,Department of Gastroenterology
[2] Department of Pharmacology,Endoscopy Department
[3] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,Department of Radiodiagnosis
[4] Surat Institute of Digestive Sciences,Department of Surgery
[5] Moscow Clinical Science Centre Named By A.S. Loginov,undefined
[6] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,undefined
[7] Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,undefined
来源
Esophagus | 2021年 / 18卷
关键词
Diverticulum; Esophagus; FESD; D-POEM; Success;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional way to tackle Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 450
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mandavdhare, Harshal S.
    Praveen Kumar, M.
    Jha, Dayakrishna
    Kumar, Antriksh
    Sharma, Vishal
    Desai, Pankaj
    Shumkina, Lada
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Singh, Harjeet
    Dutta, Usha
    ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 18 (03) : 436 - 450
  • [2] Short versus long esophageal myotomy during peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials
    Nabi, Zaheer
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Mandavdhare, Harshal
    Reddy, D. Nageshwar
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (04): : 261 - +
  • [3] Long-term Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nabi, Zaheer
    Mandavdhare, Harshal
    Akbar, Wahid
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 57 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [4] Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with septotomy for the treatment of distal esophageal diverticula (D-POEM)
    Paul Basile
    Jean-Michel Gonzalez
    Jean-Philippe Le Mouel
    Rodrigo Irarrazaval
    Ludovic Caillo
    Marc Barthet
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 2321 - 2325
  • [5] Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with septotomy for the treatment of distal esophageal diverticula (D-POEM)
    Basile, Paul
    Gonzalez, Jean-Michel
    Le Mouel, Jean-Philippe
    Irarrazaval, Rodrigo
    Caillo, Ludovic
    Barthet, Marc
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (05): : 2321 - 2325
  • [6] Efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy in esophageal luminal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vohra, Ishaan
    Gopakumar, Harishankar
    Sharma, Neil R.
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [7] Treatment of Achalasia with Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy: Analysis of 50 Consecutive Patients
    Kane, Erica D.
    Desilets, David J.
    Wilson, Donna
    Leduc, Marc
    Budhraja, Vikram
    Romanelli, John R.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (05): : 514 - 525
  • [8] Management of esophageal anastomotic leaks, a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Murray, William
    Davey, Mathew G.
    Robb, William
    Donlon, Noel E.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 37 (07)
  • [9] Success of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without stents: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Orsolini, Maria Julia
    Schellini, Silvana Artioli
    Souza Meneguim, Roberta Lilian Fernandes
    Cataneo, Antonio Jose Maria
    ORBIT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS-OCULOPLASTIC AND LACRIMAL SURGERY, 2020, 39 (04): : 258 - 265
  • [10] Best additional management after non-curative endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Flor de Lima, Margarida
    Castro, Barbara
    Rodriguez-Carrasco, Marta
    Libanio, Diogo
    Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro
    Sousa, Olga
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 57 (05) : 525 - 533