A randomized, double-blind, active control, multicenter, dose-finding study of lipegfilgrastim (XM22) in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy

被引:0
作者
Anton Buchner
Reiner Elsässer
Peter Bias
机构
[1] Teva Ratiopharm/Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc.,Biosimilars Clinical Development
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2014年 / 148卷
关键词
Lipegfilgrastim; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Neutropenia; Breast cancer; Phase 2 clinical trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This dose-ranging study was conducted to identify the optimal fixed dose of lipegfilgrastim compared with pegfilgrastim 6.0 mg for the provision of neutrophil support during myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. A phase 2 study was conducted in which 208 chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive lipegfilgrastim 3.0, 4.5, or 6.0 mg or pegfilgrastim 6.0 mg. Study drugs were administered as a single subcutaneous injection on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle (doxorubicin/docetaxel on day 1 for four 3-week cycles). The primary outcome measure was duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1. Patients treated with lipegfilgrastim experienced shorter DSN in cycle 1 with higher doses. The mean DSN was 0.76 days in the lipegfilgrastim 6.0-mg group and 0.87 days in the pegfilgrastim 6.0-mg group, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Treatment with lipegfilgrastim 6.0 mg was consistently associated with a higher absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at nadir, shorter ANC recovery time, and a similar safety and tolerability profile compared with pegfilgrastim. This phase 2 study demonstrated that lipegfilgrastim 6.0 mg is the optimal dose for patients with breast cancer and provides neutrophil support that is at least equivalent to the standard 6.0-mg fixed dose of pegfilgrastim.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 116
页数:9
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Holmes FA(2002)Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer J Clin Oncol 20 727-731
[2]  
O’Shaughnessy JA(2011)2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours Eur J Cancer 47 8-32
[3]  
Vukelja S(2011)Colony-stimulating factors in the prevention and management of infectious diseases Infect Dis Clin N Am 25 803-817
[4]  
Jones SE(2006)2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based, clinical practice guideline J Clin Oncol 24 3187-3205
[5]  
Shogan J(2012)Presently available biosimilars in hematology-oncology: G-CSF Target Oncol 7 S29-S34
[6]  
Savin M(2011)Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim Clin Pharmacokin 50 295-306
[7]  
Glaspy J(2009)Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropenia management: results from an integrated analysis Eur J Cancer 45 608-617
[8]  
Moore M(2003)A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy Ann Oncol 14 29-35
[9]  
Meza L(2010)Management of febrile neutropenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines Ann Oncol 21 v252-v256
[10]  
Wiznitzer I(2008)XM02 is superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy BMC Cancer 8 332-338