A two-level evolutionary algorithm for solving the facility location and design (1|1)-centroid problem on the plane with variable demand

被引:0
作者
J. L. Redondo
A. G. Arrondo
J. Fernández
I. García
P. M. Ortigosa
机构
[1] University of Granada,Department of Computer Architecture and Technology
[2] University of Murcia,Department of Statistics and Operations Research
[3] University of Málaga,Department of Computer Architecture
[4] University of Almería,Department of Computer Architecture and Electronics
[5] ceiA3,undefined
来源
Journal of Global Optimization | 2013年 / 56卷
关键词
Nonlinear bi-level programming problem; Centroid (or Stackelberg) problem; Continuous location; Competition; Variable demand; Evolutionary algorithm; Multistart heuristic; Grid search;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this work, the problem of a company or chain (the leader) that considers the reaction of a competitor chain (the follower) is studied. In particular, the leader wants to set up a single new facility in a planar market where similar facilities of the follower, and possibly of its own chain, are already present. The follower will react by locating another single facility after the leader locates its own facility. Both the location and the quality (representing design, quality of products, prices, etc.) of the new leader’s facility have to be found. The aim is to maximize the profit obtained by the leader considering the future follower’s entry. The demand is supposed to be concentrated at n demand points. Each demand point splits its buying power among the facilities proportionally to the attraction it feels for them. The attraction of a demand point for a facility depends on both the location and the quality of the facility. Usually, the demand is considered in the literature to be fixed or constant regardless the conditions of the market. In this paper, the demand varies depending on the attraction for the facilities. Taking variable demand into consideration makes the model more realistic. However, it increases the complexity of the problem and, therefore, the computational effort needed to solve it. Three heuristic methods are proposed to cope with this hard-to-solve global optimization problem, namely, a grid search procedure, a multistart algorithm and a two-level evolutionary algorithm. The computational studies show that the evolutionary algorithm is both the most robust algorithm and the one that provides the best results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 1005
页数:22
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Eiselt H.A.(1993)Competitive location models: a framework and bibliography Transport. Sci. 27 44-54
  • [2] Laporte G.(1999)Economics of location: a selective survey Comput. Oper. Res. 26 1369-1394
  • [3] Thisse J.F.(2001)Static competitive facility location: an overview of optimisation approaches Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129 461-470
  • [4] Kilkenny M.(1997)Sequential location problems Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96 217-231
  • [5] Thisse J.F.(1929)Stability in competition Econ. J. 39 41-57
  • [6] Plastria F.(1983)On locating new facilities in a competitive environment Eur. J. Oper. Res. 12 29-35
  • [7] Eiselt H.A.(1982)Competitive location strategies for two facilities Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 12 485-493
  • [8] Laporte G.(2003)An alternating heuristic for medianoid and centroid problems in the plane Comput. Oper. Res. 30 553-565
  • [9] Hotelling H.(1998)Facility location in anticipation of future competition Locat. Sci. 6 155-173
  • [10] Hakimi S.L.(2002)Retail facility location under changing market conditions IMA J. Manag. Math. 13 283-302