Lexical processes in the recognition of Japanese horizontal and vertical compounds

被引:0
作者
Koji Miwa
Ton Dijkstra
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen,Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft
[2] Radboud University Nijmegen,Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour
来源
Reading and Writing | 2017年 / 30卷
关键词
Visual word recognition; Reading direction; Morphological processing; Japanese; Lexical decision; Eye-tracking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This lexical decision eye-tracking study investigated whether horizontal and vertical readings elicit comparable behavioral patterns and whether reading directions modulate lexical processes. Response times and eye movements were recorded during a lexical decision task with Japanese bimorphemic compound words presented vertically. The data were then analyzed together with those obtained in a horizontal lexical decision experiment of Miwa, Libben, Dijkstra, and Baayen (2014). Linear mixed-effects analyses of response times and eye movements revealed that, although response times and first fixation durations were notably shorter in horizontal reading than vertical reading, the vertical reading elicited fewer fixations. Furthermore, while compounds were recognized largely in comparable ways regardless of reading direction, several lexical processes were found to be reading-direction-dependent. Particularly, processing of the first morpheme was modulated by reading direction in a late time frame, such that a horizontal reading advantage was observed for words with a high frequency first morpheme. All in all, the two reading directions do not only differ quantitatively in processing speed, but also qualitatively in terms of underlying processing mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 812
页数:21
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Baayen RH(2008)Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items Journal of Memory and Language 59 390-412
[2]  
Davidson DJ(1997)Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model Journal of Memory and Language 37 94-117
[3]  
Bates DM(2013)Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal Journal of Memory and Language 68 255-278
[4]  
Baayen RH(2003)The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds Journal of Memory and Language 48 615-634
[5]  
Dijkstra T(1964)An analysis of transformations (with discussion) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 26 211-252
[6]  
Schreuder R(1997)The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 776-781
[7]  
Barr DJ(2000)The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments Memory & Cognition 28 1109-1115
[8]  
Levy R(2001)Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 127-131
[9]  
Scheepers C(2008)More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis Journal of Memory and Language 58 787-814
[10]  
Tily HJ(2009)Not all visual expertise is holistic, but it may be leftist Psychological Science 20 455-463