How to improve the assessment of BPM maturity in the era of digital transformation

被引:0
作者
Marek Szelągowski
Justyna Berniak-Woźny
机构
[1] Systems Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences,
来源
Information Systems and e-Business Management | 2022年 / 20卷
关键词
Business process management (BPM); BPM maturity models (BPM MM); Process nature; Industry 4.0; Digital transformation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For almost 30 years, the way of building business process management maturity models (BPM MMs), the importance assigned to individual maturity levels, and the criteria and critical success factors chosen for BPM maturity assessment have not changed significantly, despite the fact that during those three decades, the business environment and organizations themselves have changed enormously. The impact of hyperautomation and the increasing pace of change require the integration of maturity assessment with the BPM implementation methodology, including the repetition of maturity assessment for selected groups of processes. This causes an urgent need to adapt both process maturity assessment methods and BPM MMs to changing working conditions and business requirements. This conceptual paper is based on a model approach. The framework presented in the article continues and at the same time clearly deviates from the tradition of building BPM MMs on the basis of the Capability Maturity Model (CMM). It proposes a two-stage comprehensive process of organizational process maturity assessment, fully integrated into the process of BPM implementation and further business process management. The presented framework makes it possible to assess the process maturity of Industry 4.0 organizations in which dynamic knowledge-intensive business processes (kiBPs) play a key role in creating value.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 198
页数:27
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [11] Gable G(2017)Editor’s comments: developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate Acad Manag Rev 42 1-729
  • [12] Rosemann M(2020)An empirical study on Green BPM adoption: contextual factors and performance J Softw Evol Process 2 725-60
  • [13] Becker J(2012)A success model for business process management implementation Int J Inf Electron Eng 30 55-81
  • [14] Knackstedt R(1997)How to stay flexible and elude fads Qual Prog 26 75-26
  • [15] Poeppelbuss J(2009)Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government Gov Inf Q 10 18-154
  • [16] Bititci U(2020)Designing conceptual articles: four approaches AMS Review 95 136-277
  • [17] Garengo P(2021)A knowledge-intensive adaptive business process management framework Inf Syst 75 265-266
  • [18] Ates A(2016)Quality in business process modeling Springer 8 243-624
  • [19] Nudurupati S(2011)A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing J Mark 16 596-815
  • [20] Buh B(2010)Towards a typology of knowledge-intensive organizations: determinant factors Knowl Manag Res Pract 23 792-15