Comparative efficacy of ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy or computed tomography guidance in spinal nerve injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Kimura, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Yamamoto, Norio [2 ,3 ]
Watanabe, Jun [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Ono, Yuichi [1 ]
Hongo, Michio [1 ]
Miyakoshi, Naohisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Akita Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Grad Sch Med, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita 0108543, Japan
[2] Sci Res WorkS Peer Support Grp SRWS PSG, Osaka, Japan
[3] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Okayama, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Div Gastroenterol Gen & Transplant Surg, Dept Surg, Yakushiji Shimotsuke Cit, Tochigi, Japan
[5] Ichi Med Univ, Ctr Community Med, Yakushiji Shimotsuke Cit, Tochigi, Japan
关键词
Computed tomography; Fluoroscopy; Meta-analysis; Spinal nerve injection; Ultrasound; LOWER CERVICAL-SPINE; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; CLINICAL GUIDELINE; RADICULAR PAIN; ROOT BLOCK; DIAGNOSIS; RADICULOPATHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-023-07968-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeSpinal nerve injections have traditionally been performed under fluoroscopic (FL) and computed tomography (CT) guidance. Recently, ultrasound (US)-guided procedures have provided an alternative guidance approach that does not expose the patient and operator to radiation. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of US-guided spinal nerve injections compared with FL- or CT-guided spinal nerve injections.MethodsMEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov database searches for inclusion until February 2023 were independently performed by two authors using predefined criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes were change in pain score (numeric rating scale or visual analogue scale) and major adverse events. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, change in functional disability score and minor adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model. We evaluated the certainty of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment and Development (GRADE) approach.ResultsEight RCTs involving 962 patients were included. There might be little to no difference in the mean score of the pain change between the US-guided methods and the FL- or CT-guided injections (standard mean difference -0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 to 0.15). US guidance probably reduced major adverse events (0.7% [3/433] and 6.5% [28/433], respectively), reduced procedure time (mean difference -4.19 min; 95% CI -5.09 to -3.30), and probably reduced minor adverse events (2.1% [9/433] and 4.2% [18/433], respectively) compared with FL or CT guidance. There was probably little to no difference in the change in functional disability score with either method.ConclusionUS-guided spinal nerve injections remained effective and reduced adverse events compared with conventional FL- or CT-guided spinal nerve injections. Further RCTs are required to verify our results.Study registrationOpen Science Forum (Available from: https://osf.io/vt92w/).
引用
收藏
页码:4101 / 4110
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hulten, Edward A.
    Carbonaro, Salvatore
    Petrillo, Sara P.
    Mitchell, Joshua D.
    Villines, Todd C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (10) : 1237 - 1247
  • [22] Computed tomography for assessing resectability of gallbladder carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Bing
    Xu, Xiao Xue
    Du, Yong
    Yang, Han Feng
    Li, Yang
    Zhang, Qing
    Xiao, Dong Mei
    Huang, Ya Yong
    Meng, Jun
    Wang, Wen Xuan
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (02) : 327 - 333
  • [23] Computed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis Of Brain Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kramer, Andreas H.
    Roberts, Derek J.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2014, 21 (03) : 539 - 550
  • [24] Diagnostic performance of computed tomography for bowel endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Hyesung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 119
  • [25] Efficacy of risdiplam in spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pascual-Morena, Carlos
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Martinez-Garcia, Irene
    Moreno-Herraiz, Nerea
    Alvarez-Bueno, Celia
    Saz-Lara, Alicia
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 44 (01): : 97 - 105
  • [26] Computed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis Of Brain Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andreas H. Kramer
    Derek J. Roberts
    Neurocritical Care, 2014, 21 : 539 - 550
  • [27] A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Guidance Techniques in Botulinum Toxin Injections and Their Hierarchy in the Treatment of Limb Spasticity
    Asimakidou, Evridiki
    Sidiropoulos, Christos
    TOXINS, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [28] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the influence of thyroid dysfunction in early pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes under ultrasound guidance
    Geng, Xuna
    Chen, Yu
    Li, Shiying
    Wang, Weijing
    Wu, Wei
    Sun, Congxin
    Li, Na
    Wang, Lufang
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03) : 1001 - 1016
  • [29] Value of Repeat Head Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Reljic, Tea
    Mahony, Helen
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Etchason, Jeff
    Paxton, Hannah
    Flores, Michelle
    Kumar, Ambuj
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (01) : 78 - 98
  • [30] Methodological Guidance Papers: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review
    Pigott, Terri D.
    Polanin, Joshua R.
    REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 90 (01) : 24 - 46