Comparative efficacy of ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy or computed tomography guidance in spinal nerve injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
作者
Kimura, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Yamamoto, Norio [2 ,3 ]
Watanabe, Jun [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Ono, Yuichi [1 ]
Hongo, Michio [1 ]
Miyakoshi, Naohisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Akita Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Grad Sch Med, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita 0108543, Japan
[2] Sci Res WorkS Peer Support Grp SRWS PSG, Osaka, Japan
[3] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Okayama, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Div Gastroenterol Gen & Transplant Surg, Dept Surg, Yakushiji Shimotsuke Cit, Tochigi, Japan
[5] Ichi Med Univ, Ctr Community Med, Yakushiji Shimotsuke Cit, Tochigi, Japan
关键词
Computed tomography; Fluoroscopy; Meta-analysis; Spinal nerve injection; Ultrasound; LOWER CERVICAL-SPINE; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; CLINICAL GUIDELINE; RADICULAR PAIN; ROOT BLOCK; DIAGNOSIS; RADICULOPATHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-023-07968-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeSpinal nerve injections have traditionally been performed under fluoroscopic (FL) and computed tomography (CT) guidance. Recently, ultrasound (US)-guided procedures have provided an alternative guidance approach that does not expose the patient and operator to radiation. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of US-guided spinal nerve injections compared with FL- or CT-guided spinal nerve injections.MethodsMEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov database searches for inclusion until February 2023 were independently performed by two authors using predefined criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes were change in pain score (numeric rating scale or visual analogue scale) and major adverse events. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, change in functional disability score and minor adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model. We evaluated the certainty of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment and Development (GRADE) approach.ResultsEight RCTs involving 962 patients were included. There might be little to no difference in the mean score of the pain change between the US-guided methods and the FL- or CT-guided injections (standard mean difference -0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 to 0.15). US guidance probably reduced major adverse events (0.7% [3/433] and 6.5% [28/433], respectively), reduced procedure time (mean difference -4.19 min; 95% CI -5.09 to -3.30), and probably reduced minor adverse events (2.1% [9/433] and 4.2% [18/433], respectively) compared with FL or CT guidance. There was probably little to no difference in the change in functional disability score with either method.ConclusionUS-guided spinal nerve injections remained effective and reduced adverse events compared with conventional FL- or CT-guided spinal nerve injections. Further RCTs are required to verify our results.Study registrationOpen Science Forum (Available from: https://osf.io/vt92w/).
引用
收藏
页码:4101 / 4110
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders [J].
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Ghiselli, Gary ;
Gilbert, Thomas J. ;
Kreiner, D. Scott ;
Reitman, Charles ;
Summers, Jeffrey T. ;
Baisden, Jamie L. ;
Easa, John ;
Fernand, Robert ;
Lamer, Tim ;
Matz, Paul G. ;
Mazanec, Daniel J. ;
Resnick, Daniel K. ;
Shaffer, William O. ;
Sharma, Anil K. ;
Timmons, Reuben B. ;
Toton, John F. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (01) :64-72
[2]   A cervical anterior spinal artery syndrome after diagnostic blockade of the right C6-nerve root [J].
Brouwers, PJAM ;
Kottink, EJBL ;
Simon, MAM ;
Prevo, RL .
PAIN, 2001, 91 (03) :397-399
[3]   An open-label non-inferiority randomized trail comparing the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root block and fluoroscopy-guided cervical transforaminal epidural block for cervical radiculopathy [J].
Cui, Xiaohong ;
Zhang, Di ;
Zhao, Yongming ;
Song, Yongsheng ;
He, Liangliang ;
Zhang, Jian .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2022, 54 (01) :2681-2691
[4]   The Oswestry Disability Index [J].
Fairbank, JCT ;
Pynsent, PB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) :2940-2952
[5]  
Guyatt GH, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P1311, DOI [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004]
[6]  
Higgins JPT., 2019, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, DOI 10.1002/9781119536604.ch8
[7]   Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study [J].
Jee, Haemi ;
Lee, Ji Hae ;
Kim, Jongwoo ;
Park, Ki Deok ;
Lee, Woo Yong ;
Park, Yongbum .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) :69-78
[8]   Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica [J].
Jensen, Rikke K. ;
Kongsted, Alice ;
Kjaer, Per ;
Koes, Bart .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367
[9]  
Khalafallah A, 2010, MEDITERR J HEMATOL I, V2, DOI [10.4084/MJHID.2010.005, 10.1136/bmj.l4898]
[10]   National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy [J].
Kjaer, Per ;
Kongsted, Alice ;
Hartvigsen, Jan ;
Isenberg-Jorgensen, Alexander ;
Schiottz-Christensen, Berit ;
Soborg, Bolette ;
Krog, Charlotte ;
Moller, Christian Martin ;
Halling, Christine Marie Baeko ;
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein ;
Hansen, Inge Ris ;
Norregaard, Jesper ;
Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl ;
Hansen, Lars Valentin ;
Jakobsen, Marie ;
Jensen, Martin Bach ;
Melbye, Martin ;
Duel, Peter ;
Christensen, Steffan W. ;
Povlsen, Tina Myung .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (09) :2242-2257