Oxidative treatments for cellulose nanofibers production: a comparative study between TEMPO-mediated and ammonium persulfate oxidation

被引:0
作者
Inese Filipova
Ferran Serra
Quim Tarrés
Pere Mutjé
Marc Delgado-Aguilar
机构
[1] Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry,LEPAMAP Research Group
[2] University of Girona,undefined
来源
Cellulose | 2020年 / 27卷
关键词
Ammonium persulfate oxidation; TEMPO-mediated oxidation; Cellulose nanofibers; Recycled paper;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the recent years, several methods for producing cellulose nanofibers (CNF) have appeared. Depending on the type of treatment and its conditions, the source of cellulose and the fibrillation method, different properties and characteristics can be obtained. TEMPO-mediated oxidation has been extensively used for CNF production and it is considered as one of the most suitable treatments to obtain high-performance CNF with superior properties and reduced size. However, the recovery of the catalyst and its cost is still a challenge. In the recent years, the oxidation by means of ammonium persulfate (APS) has appeared as a potential alternative, although it is commonly used for cellulose nanocrystals production. The present work aims at comparing the properties of CNF obtained by means of TEMPO-mediated oxidation (TOCNF) and ammonium persulfate oxidation (APSCNF). For this, a similar oxidation degree was selected, adjusting the treatment conditions of both oxidative methods. The obtained results exhibited that similar properties can be obtained with different production costs associated. In addition, the APSCNF exhibited a significantly lower degree of polymerization and slightly higher transmittance, indicating the presence of higher crystalline regions. Finally, both types of CNF were tested over a recycled paper substrate, revealing that both APSCNF and TOCNF significantly increased the mechanical properties of paper with low effect on pulp drainability, representing a great advantage for the paper industry.
引用
收藏
页码:10671 / 10688
页数:17
相关论文
共 278 条
[1]  
Abou-Zeid RE(2018)Novel method of preparation of tricarboxylic cellulose nanofiber for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution Int J Biol Macromol 80 677-686
[2]  
Dacrory S(2010)Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions after freezing Carbohydr Polym 68 748-757
[3]  
Ali KA(1990)The yield stress of fibre suspensions Can J Chem Eng 25 1309-1318
[4]  
Kamel S(2018)Contribution of lignin to the surface structure and physical performance of cellulose nanofibrils film Cellulose 12 479-488
[5]  
Agoda-Tandjawa G(1968)Viscoelastic hysteresis. Part I. Model predictions Trans Soc Rheol 13 171-180
[6]  
Durand S(2006)Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis Cellulose 154 151-166
[7]  
Berot S(2016)Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: a review Carbohydr Polym 7 1666-1686
[8]  
Bennington CPJ(2012)Absorbent materials based on kraft pulp: preparation and material characterization BioResources 19 1413-1423
[9]  
Kerekes RJ(2012)Reinforced absorbent material: a cellulosic composite of TEMPO-oxidized MFC and CTMP fibres Cellulose 21 2567-2577
[10]  
Grace JR(2014)Chiral nematic phase formation by aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals prepared by oxidation with ammonium persulfate Cellulose 15 819-830