Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems: an application to the academic field

被引:0
作者
Fiorenzo Franceschini
Elisa Turina
机构
[1] DISPEA,Politecnico di Torino
来源
Quality & Quantity | 2013年 / 47卷
关键词
Performance measurement system redesign; Quality improvement; Performance measurement; Indicators; Balanced scorecard; Higher education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing competition both in the public and private sectors gave rise to a growing interest in quality improvement and in designing and implementing Performance Measurement Systems (PMS). Academic organizations also recognized the need for implementing performance measurement systems. Some recent works on PMS in the higher education make use of the Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard (BSC) to translate the characteristic strategic goals (e.g. research and teaching excellence) into performance measures. However, a PMS needs to be updated when external or internal changes influence the organization modus operandi. In this way a continuous quality improvement of organization performance is required. This paper describes a methodology based on the BSC model to redesign a current PMS. In detail, a reference BSC-check matrix is proposed. A “mapping analysis” of the current PMS is developed to understand if all the operational aspects involved in goals achievement are considered and if proper indicators have been defined. As an example, the methodology is applied to a Department of the authors’ own University. The paper shows also how the proposed approach can be extended to other contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 483
页数:18
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [21] Flapper S.D.R.(1993)Putting the balanced scorecard to work Harv. Bus. Rev. 71 134-147
  • [22] Fortuin L.(2005)Applying the balanced scorecard to education J. Educ. Bus. 80 222-231
  • [23] Stoop P.P.M.(2002)A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22 1222-1246
  • [24] Franceschini F.(2003)Measuring performance in a changing business environment Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 23 213-229
  • [25] Galetto M.(1996)From balanced scorecard to strategy gauge: is measurement worth it? Manag. Rev. 85 56-62
  • [26] Maisano D.(2008)Strategy revitalization in academe: A balanced scorecard approach Int. J. Educ. Manag. 22 32-47
  • [27] Franceschini F.(2007)Evaluation and management of multi-departmental (horizontal) science and technology programs Res. Eval. 16 183-190
  • [28] Maisano D.(1995)Performance measurement systems design. A literature review and a research agenda Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 15 80-116
  • [29] Franceschini F.(2005)The evolution of performance measurement research. Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25 1264-1277
  • [30] Maisano D.(2006)Insights from the balanced scorecard - implementing the balanced scorecard at a college of business Meas. Bus. Excell. 10 15-22