Green development in BRICS: unraveling the effects of environmental technology, R&D spending, and green investment in the context of COP21

被引：0
作者：
Muhammad Tayyab Sohail
机构：
[1] Xiangtan University,School of Public Administration
[2] Xiangtan University,South Asia Research Center, School of Public Administration
来源：
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词：
Environmental technology; R&D spending; Green investment; Green growth; Environmental sustainability;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The BRICS countries are renowned for their rapidly developing economies and growing populations. However, the environmental challenges associated with their economic growth have raised concerns about sustainability and the need for green growth strategies. In recent times, empirics have started to analyze the determinants of green growth, but very few have focused on environmental technological capital, R&D, and green investment. This study examines the impact of environmental technological capital, R&D, and green investment on green growth in BRICS economies from 1995 to 2020 using a panel ARDL model. The study found that green investment, environmental technology, and R&D positively facilitate green growth in the BRICS economies in the long run. The long-run country-wise estimate of green investment is positively significant in Brazil and Russia. On the other side, the estimated coefficient of environmental technology is positive in Brazil, India, and China. However, the estimated coefficient of R&D is positive in China only. In the short run, the results are a mix, whether group-wise or country-wise. Based on the results, the study will recommend policy suggestions for green R&D, development of environmental technology, and green investment that help in enhancing green growth.
引用
收藏
页码：120000 / 120009
页数：9
相关论文
共 159 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D(2012)The environment and directed technical change Am Econ Rev 102 131-166
[2]  
Aghion P(2020)The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation Resources Policy 69 101817-14769
[3]  
Bursztyn L(2023)Do environmental technology and banking sector development matter for green growth? Evidence from top-polluted economies Environ Sci Pollut Res 30 14760-816
[4]  
Hemous D(2022)Neoliberal extractivism: Brazil in the twenty-first century J Peasant Stud 49 793-287
[5]  
Ahmad M(2021)Public debt and economic growth: panel data evidence for Asian countries J Econ Finance 45 270-205
[6]  
Jiang P(2023)Green innovation-green growth nexus in BRICS: does financial globalization matter? J Innov Knowl 8 189-455
[7]  
Majeed A(2022)Does a green tax impact a heavy-polluting firm’s green investments? Appl Econ 54 7416-197
[8]  
Umar M(2022)Enhancing green finance for inclusive green growth: a systematic approach Sustainability 14 431-377
[9]  
Khan Z(2004)Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey Ecol Econ 49 12528-372
[10]  
Muhammad S(2023)Towards a green economy in China? Examining the impact of the internet of things and environmental regulation on green growth Sustainability 15 189-719
12345678910