Visualising multi-criteria weight elicitation by multiple stakeholders in complex decision systems

被引:0
作者
Pierre L. Kunsch
Jean-Pierre Brans
机构
[1] Vrije Universiteit Brussel,BUTO Department
来源
Operational Research | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
Complex systems; Multiple criteria; Weight elicitation; Multiple stakeholders; Visualisation tools; 90B50;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An efficient and transparent weight elicitation technique is proposed for inclusion into the adaptive, systemic, control and multi-criteria-based methodology, in short ASCM, the purpose of which is piloting in real time complex systems by combining system dynamics (SD) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Piloting policies are established and revised on a regular basis and/or constant real-time observation by means of SD simulations; at each revision step groups of stakeholders choose by means of MCDA tools the best policy to be implemented for the ensuing time periods when adaptations are necessary to account for the actual system evolution. An essential but difficult issue at each policy revision step is the weight elicitation process of multiple criteria by the multiple stakeholder groups (SH). The proposed procedure with a strong mathematical background does not require excessive cognitive effort for SH with different priorities and decisional powers. It consists in a two-step approach defining firstly importance classes on ordinal Likert scales, and secondly profiles on those scales for the criteria. It appears to be simple though rigorous; it easily allows fast sensitivity analyses when confronting different opinions. A didactic example and a fishery-management case study illustrate these properties by means of visualisation tools facilitating consensus-seeking among SH.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 971
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ahn BS(2017)Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters Omega 72 87-95
[2]  
Barron FH(1992)Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights Acta Physiol (Oxf) 80 91-103
[3]  
Barron FH(1996)Decision quality using ranked attribute weights Manag Sci 42 1515-1523
[4]  
Barrett BE(2010)PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications Eur J Oper Res 200 198-215
[5]  
Behzadian M(2010)Ethics in operations research and sustainable development Int Trans Oper Res (ITOR) 17 427-444
[6]  
Kazemzadeh RB(1985)A preference ranking organization method Manag Sci 31 647-656
[7]  
Albadvi A(1998)Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes. An iterative real-time procedure Eur J Oper Res 109 428-441
[8]  
Aghdasi M(2002)Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure Eur J Oper Res 139 317-326
[9]  
Brans JP(1999)Experimental evaluation of a graphical display system to visualizing multiple criteria solutions Eur J Oper Res 119 191-208
[10]  
Kunsch PL(2018)Multiple-criteria performance ranking based on profile distributions: an application to university research evaluations Math Comput Simul 154 48-64