Efficacy and safety of plerixafor for the mobilization/collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma

被引:0
作者
Masaki Ri
Kosei Matsue
Kazutaka Sunami
Chihiro Shimazaki
Akio Hayashi
Yoshinori Sunaga
Toru Sasaki
Kenshi Suzuki
机构
[1] Nagoya City University Hospital,Department of Hematology and Oncology
[2] Kameda Medical Center,Department of Hematology and Oncology
[3] National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center,Department of Hematology
[4] Japan Community Health care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center,Department of Hematology
[5] Sanofi K.K.,Department of Hematology
[6] Japanese Red Cross Medical Center,undefined
来源
International Journal of Hematology | 2017年 / 106卷
关键词
Plerixafor; G-CSF; Multiple myeloma; Stem cell; Apheresis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of plerixafor for the mobilization/collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for autologous transplantation in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In a randomized study, patients received G-CSF (filgrastim, 400 µg/m2/day) for 4 days prior to the first dose of plerixafor. Starting on Day 4 evening and for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 µg/kg/day) + G-CSF group (PG group) or G-CSF alone (G group). Daily apheresis started on Day 5 for up to 4 days, or until ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. A total of 7 patients were randomized in each treatment group. Five patients in PG group and no patients in G group achieved a collection of ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in ≤2 days of apheresis [difference of 71.4% (90%CI 29–100%)]. These results were supported by the shorter median time to collect ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (2 days in PG group; no patient in G group). The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher in PG group than in G group. Plerixafor was well tolerated, and effective for the mobilization/collection of peripheral HSCs for autologous transplantation in Japanese patients with MM.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 572
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Child JA(2003)Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 348 1875-1883
[2]  
Morgan GJ(2005)High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe J Clin Oncol 23 9227-9233
[3]  
Davies FE(2013)Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone Bone Marrow Transpl 48 1444-1449
[4]  
Owen RG(2004)Predictive factors for successful stem cell mobilization in patients with indolent lymphoproliferative disorders previously treated with fludarabine Leukemia 18 1034-1038
[5]  
Bell SE(1996)Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma Bone Marrow Transpl 17 937-941
[6]  
Hawkins K(2010)Current status of stem cell mobilization Br J Haematol 150 647-662
[7]  
Fermand JP(1999)Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4 Science 283 845-848
[8]  
Katsahian S(2004)Leukocytosis and Mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells by AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist Support Cancer Ther 1 165-172
[9]  
Divine M(2000)A randomized phase 2 study of PBPC mobilization by stem cell factor and filgrastim in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin’s disease or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Bone Marrow Transpl 26 471-481
[10]  
Leblond V(1998)Effect of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cell dose on hematopoietic recovery Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 4 84-92