High regeneration potential in vitro of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) lines derived from interspecific hybridization

被引:0
|
作者
Steffen Weber
Renate Horn
Wolfgang Friedt
机构
[1] Justus-Liebig-Universität,Institut für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzüchtung I
来源
Euphytica | 2000年 / 116卷
关键词
culture ; genetic transformation; sp.; interspecific hybridization; sunflower; wild species;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Successful selection of interspecific hybrid progenies with superior ability to regenerate shoots from apical meristems was performed in sunflower which now allows for the development of lines for improved biotechnological applications. Early generations of interspecific hybrids originating from crosses between the two H. annuus CMS lines ‘HA89’ and ‘Baso’, and 9 wild species were screened for their ability to regenerate in vitro. Evaluation of 36 progenies allowed to identify seven progenies from crosses involving H. mollis, H. giganteus, H. strumosus, and H. decapetalus which showed a significantly higher regeneration potential than the commercial hybrid ‘Albena’ regarding the number of shoots per explant. Among these progenies, 47.2 to 62.4% of explants produced shoots with an average of 2.3 to 3.5 shoots per cultured explant. Regeneration in vitro was significantly determined by the genotype. More than half of the investigated interspecific hybrids performed better than the inbred ‘HA89’ demonstrating that the high regeneration potential available in the wild species can be efficiently transferred to cultivated sunflower. The seven progenies with high regeneration potential in vitro were characterised by agronomic performance in the field. Two of the interspecific hybrids derived from H. strumosus and H. decapetalus not only showed a superior regeneration potential but also proved to be competitive to commercial hybrids with regard to important agronomic traits, e.g. fat content and TGW.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 280
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A shoot regeneration protocol effective on diverse genotypes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
    Dong-Ho Shin
    Jin Sook Kim
    In Jeong Kim
    Jaemo Yang
    Soo Kyung Oh
    Gab Chae Chung
    Kyung-Hwan Han
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2000, 36 : 273 - 278
  • [12] Genotype dependent callus induction and shoot regeneration in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
    Ozyigit, Ibrahim Ilker
    Gozukirmizi, Nermin
    Semiz, Belma Derman
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 6 (13): : 1498 - 1502
  • [13] A shoot regeneration protocol effective on diverse genotypes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
    Shin, DH
    Kim, JS
    Kim, IJ
    Yang, J
    Oh, SK
    Chung, GC
    Han, KH
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2000, 36 (04) : 273 - 278
  • [14] CREATING SUNFLOWER MUTANT LINES (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) USING INDUCED MUTAGENESIS
    Encheva, J.
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2009, 15 (02): : 109 - 118
  • [15] Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Immature Embryo and Cotyledon Explants of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
    Meral, Uelkue Binboga
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES-TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2007, 13 (02): : 95 - 100
  • [16] Combining ability studies in some restorer lines of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
    Tavade, S. N.
    Burghate, S. K.
    Patil, S. P.
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2009, 10 (01) : 142 - 146
  • [17] Biochemical changes during regeneration of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L).
    Martinelli, L
    Gianazza, E
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 1996, 17 (01) : 191 - 197
  • [18] In vitro culture of isolated living sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) embryo sacs
    Marzena Popielarska
    Leslaw Przywara
    Sexual Plant Reproduction, 2003, 16 : 23 - 33
  • [19] PLANTLET REGENERATION FROM ELECTROSTIMULATED PROTOPLASTS OF SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS L)
    BARTH, S
    VOESTE, D
    WINGENDER, R
    SCHNABL, H
    BOTANICA ACTA, 1993, 106 (03): : 220 - 222
  • [20] REGENERATION OF FERTILE PLANTS FROM PROTOPLASTS OF SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS L)
    BURRUS, M
    CHANABE, C
    ALIBERT, G
    BIDNEY, D
    PLANT CELL REPORTS, 1991, 10 (04) : 161 - 166