Effect of development on water quality for seven streams in North Carolina

被引:0
作者
D. E. Line
机构
[1] NC State University,Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2013年 / 185卷
关键词
Development; Water quality; Pollutant export;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, baseflow and storm discharges were monitored in seven watersheds of varying development density to document the effects of development on stream water quality. In addition, two of the watersheds contained package wastewater treatment facilities, which were evaluated as an alternative to residential on-site septic systems. Monthly grab samples of baseflow and flow-proportional samples of storm event discharge were collected and analyzed for nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, and bacteria. For the five watersheds without wastewater treatment facilities, a significant linear relationship was documented between fecal coliform and enterococci levels in baseflow samples and the percentage of residential or impervious area. For the two watersheds with wastewater discharge, bacteria levels were significantly greater than those from the two relatively undeveloped watersheds. These results indicate that bacteria levels increased with increasing residential development even if many of the septic systems were replaced by a community wastewater treatment system. Computed annual export rates for ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) were correlated to the percentage of impervious surfaces in the watersheds, while the rates for other nitrogen forms, total phosphorus, and total suspended sediment were not. Annual export rates from the two mostly undeveloped watersheds were greater than a compilation of rates for undeveloped areas across the USA. Export from the four watersheds with more than 68 % residential land use was less than those reported from local and national studies of residential areas.
引用
收藏
页码:6277 / 6289
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Booth DB(1997)Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation Journal American Water Resources Association 33 1077-1090
  • [2] Jackson CR(2009)Assessment tools for urban catchments: developing stressor gradients Journal American Water Resources Association 45 291-305
  • [3] Bressler DW(2006)Shellfish closures in southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina: septic tanks vs storm-water runoff as fecal coliform sources Journal Coastal Research 22 319-327
  • [4] Paul MJ(2000)Nutrient concentrations and yields in undeveloped stream basins of the United States Journal American Water Resources Association 36 849-860
  • [5] Purcell AH(2004)Water quality in agricultural, urban, and mixed land use watersheds Journal American Water Resources Association 40 1593-1601
  • [6] Barbour MT(2000)The relationship of land use practices to surface water quality in the Upper Oconee Watershed of Georgia Forest Ecological Management 128 39-48
  • [7] Rankin ET(1994)Effects of land use water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams Hydrobiologia 294 185-199
  • [8] Resh VH(2007)Effects of development on runoff and pollutant export Water Environment Research 79 185-190
  • [9] Cahoon LB(2002)Pollutant export from various land uses in the upper Neuse River Basin Water Environment Research 74 100-108
  • [10] Hales JC(2008)Fecal coliform export from four coastal north carolina areas Journal American Water Resources Association 44 606-617