Inside the black box: Incentive regulation and incentive channeling on energy markets

被引:6
作者
Heine K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Law School, Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Postbus 1738
关键词
Energy markets; Incentive channeling; Incentive regulation; New sociological institutionalism; Organizational behavior; Public utilities; Transaction cost economics;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-011-9172-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims to achieve more insight into the complex interplay between the "external" market regulations and "internal" regulations (corporate governance) of energy firms. In recent years, many countries have deregulated the incumbent energy monopolies and have introduced new modes of regulation. However, the new incentive schemes do not represent an unmitigated success story. A major problem seems to be the neoclassical framework that is used for the analysis of energy markets. Therefore, an important goal of this paper is to clarify the boundaries of neoclassical regulation theory. There are two restrictions that hamper the neoclassical analysis of energy markets. The first is the difficulty of overcoming the widely held "black box" view of firms. The second is the idea that agents always make rational choices. The paper proposes a kind of theoretical division of labor for understanding the effectiveness of regulatory schemes in energy markets. Neoclassical economics points out to the sources of market failure, and helps to identify where in particular on the supply chain one is likely to observe natural monopolies. Transaction cost economics explains appropriate governance of vertical relations along the supply chain. And organizational theories can elucidate what happens within firms: their response to regulation, competition, and relations with suppliers. A research agenda for the third component is proposed, drawing on insights from New Sociological Institutionalism and organizational behavior. © 2011 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 186
页数:29
相关论文
共 118 条
[51]  
Kahn, A.E., The deregulatory tar baby: The precarious balance between regulation and deregulation, 1970-2000 and henceforward (2002) Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21, pp. 35-56
[52]  
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A., (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, , Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press
[53]  
(2005) Review of European Electricity Prices, , KEMA-report, Bonn: KEMA consulting
[54]  
Knieps, G., Sector-specific market power regulation versus general competition law: Criteria for judging competitive versus regulated markets (2006) Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, pp. 49-74. , F. P. Sioshansi and W. Pfaffenberger (Eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier
[55]  
Knittel, C.R., The adoption of state electricity regulation: The role of interest groups (2006) Journal of Industrial Economics, 54, pp. 201-222
[56]  
Kole, S.R., Lehn, K.M., Deregulation, the evolution of corporate governance structure and survival (1997) American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 87, pp. 421-425
[57]  
Kole, S.R., Lehn, K.M., Deregulation and the adaptation of governance structure: the case of the U.S (1999) Airline Industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, pp. 79-117
[58]  
Laffont, J.-J., The new economics of regulation ten years after (1994) Econometrica, 62, pp. 507-537
[59]  
Leibenstein, H., A branch of economics is missing: Micro-micro theory (1979) Journal of Economic Literature, 17, pp. 477-502
[60]  
Léon, O.G., On the death of SMART and the birth of GRAPA (1997) Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, pp. 249-262