Inside the black box: Incentive regulation and incentive channeling on energy markets

被引:6
作者
Heine K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Law School, Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Postbus 1738
关键词
Energy markets; Incentive channeling; Incentive regulation; New sociological institutionalism; Organizational behavior; Public utilities; Transaction cost economics;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-011-9172-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims to achieve more insight into the complex interplay between the "external" market regulations and "internal" regulations (corporate governance) of energy firms. In recent years, many countries have deregulated the incumbent energy monopolies and have introduced new modes of regulation. However, the new incentive schemes do not represent an unmitigated success story. A major problem seems to be the neoclassical framework that is used for the analysis of energy markets. Therefore, an important goal of this paper is to clarify the boundaries of neoclassical regulation theory. There are two restrictions that hamper the neoclassical analysis of energy markets. The first is the difficulty of overcoming the widely held "black box" view of firms. The second is the idea that agents always make rational choices. The paper proposes a kind of theoretical division of labor for understanding the effectiveness of regulatory schemes in energy markets. Neoclassical economics points out to the sources of market failure, and helps to identify where in particular on the supply chain one is likely to observe natural monopolies. Transaction cost economics explains appropriate governance of vertical relations along the supply chain. And organizational theories can elucidate what happens within firms: their response to regulation, competition, and relations with suppliers. A research agenda for the third component is proposed, drawing on insights from New Sociological Institutionalism and organizational behavior. © 2011 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 186
页数:29
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]  
Acton, J., Vogelsang, I., Introduction to Symposium on Price-Cap Regulation (1989) Rand Journal of Economics, 20, pp. 369-372
[2]  
Aguilera, R.V., Jackson, G., The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants (2003) Academy of Management Review, 28, pp. 447-465
[3]  
Alchian, A.A., Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory (1950) Journal of Political Economy, 58, pp. 211-221
[4]  
Alchian, A.A., Demsetz, H., Production, information costs, and economic organization (1972) American Economic Review, 62, pp. 777-795
[5]  
Armstrong, J.S., The manager's dilemma: Role conflict in marketing (1978) Future Directions for Marketing, pp. 78-89. , G. Fisk, J. Arndt, and K. Gronhaug (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute
[6]  
Batlle, C., Perez-Arriaga, I.J., Design criteria for implementing a capacity mechanism in deregulated electricity markets (2008) Utilities Policy, 16, pp. 184-193
[7]  
Baumol, W.J., (1959) Business Behavior, Value and Growth, , New York: Macmillan
[8]  
Baumol, W.J., Klevorick, A.K., Input choices and rate-of-return regulation: An overview of the discussion (1970) Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1, pp. 162-190
[9]  
Becker, G., Crime and punishment: An economic approach (1968) Journal of Political Economy, 76, pp. 169-217
[10]  
Beckert, J., Institutional isomorphism revisited: Convergence and divergence in institutional change (2010) Sociological Theory, 28, pp. 150-166