Disability Outcome Measures in Phase III Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis

被引:0
作者
Bernard M. J. Uitdehaag
机构
[1] Amsterdam Neuroscience,Department of Neurology
[2] VUmc MS Center Amsterdam,undefined
[3] VU University Medical Center,undefined
来源
CNS Drugs | 2018年 / 32卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accumulating neurological disability has a substantial impact on the lives of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). As well as the established Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), several other outcome measures are now available for assessing disability progression in MS. This review extends the findings of a previous analysis of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) trials published up to 2012, to determine whether there has been a shift in outcome measures used to assess disability in phase III clinical trials in RRMS and progressive MS. Forty relevant trials were identified (RRMS, n = 16; progressive MS, n = 18; other/mixed phenotypes, n = 6). Sustained EDSS worsening, particularly over 3 months, was included as an endpoint in almost all identified trials. Other disability-related endpoints included the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite z-score and scores for the physical component summary of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form (36-item) Health Survey. Tests assessing manual dexterity, ambulation, vision and cognition were also employed, and in some trials, composite endpoints were used. However, there was no obvious trend in choice of disability outcome measures over time. Sustained EDSS worsening over short time periods continues to be the most widely used measure of disability progression in pivotal MS trials, despite its well-recognised limitations. A new tool set is needed for use in MS clinical trials that detects the benefit of potential treatments that slow (or reverse) progressive disability.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 558
页数:15
相关论文
共 209 条
[31]  
Rudick RA(2014)Teriflunomide versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial Mult Scler. 20 705-665
[32]  
Tur C(2014)Pegylated interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (ADVANCE): a randomised, phase 3, double-blind study Lancet Neurol. 13 657-713
[33]  
Moccia M(2013)Three times weekly glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol. 73 705-1428
[34]  
Barkhof F(2015)Daclizumab HYP versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis N Engl J Med. 373 1418-1441
[35]  
Motl RW(2015)Equivalence of generic glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial JAMA Neurol. 72 1433-82
[36]  
Cohen JA(2011)Phase III dose-comparison study of glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol. 69 75-426
[37]  
Benedict R(2010)A placebo-controlled trial of oral cladribine for relapsing multiple sclerosis N Engl J Med. 362 416-897
[38]  
Feys P(2009)250 μg or 500 μg interferon beta-1b versus 20 mg glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study Lancet Neurol. 8 889-1497
[39]  
Lamers I(1998)Placebo-controlled multicentre randomised trial of interferon beta-1b in treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis Lancet. 352 1491-1155
[40]  
Francis G(2000)Cladribine and progressive MS: clinical and MRI outcomes of a multicenter controlled trial Neurology. 54 1145-1504