Assessing Riparian Conservation Land Management Practice Impacts on Gully Erosion in Iowa

被引:0
作者
George N. Zaimes
Richard C. Schultz
机构
[1] Kavala Institute of Technology (KavTech),Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Management
[2] Iowa State University,Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
来源
Environmental Management | 2012年 / 49卷
关键词
Agricultural land management practices; Conservation land management practices; Riparian areas; Gully erosion; Cattle access points; Streambank erosion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Well-established perennial vegetation in riparian areas of agricultural lands can stabilize the end points of gullies and reduce their overall erosion. The objective of this study was to investigate the impacts of riparian land management on gully erosion. A field survey documented the number of gullies and cattle access points in riparian forest buffers, grass filters, annual row-cropped fields, pastures in which the cattle were fenced out of the stream, and continuously, rotationally and intensive rotationally grazed pastures in three regions of Iowa. Gully lengths, depths and severely eroding bank areas were measured. Gullies exhibited few significant differences among riparian management practices. The most significant differences were exhibited between conservation and agricultural management practices, an indication that conservation practices could reduce gully erosion. Changes in pasture management from continuous to rotational or intensive rotational grazing showed no reductions in gully erosion. It is important to recognize that more significant differences among riparian management practices were not exhibited because the conservation and alternative grazing practices had recently been established. As gully formation is more impacted by upland than riparian management, gully stabilization might require additional upland conservation practices. The existence of numerous cattle access points in pastures where cattle have full access to the stream also indicates that these could be substantial sources of sediment for streams. Finally, the gully banks were less important sediment contributors to streams than the streambanks. The severely eroding bank areas in streams were six times greater than those in the gullies in the monitored reaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1021
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Beeson CE(1995)Comparison of bank erosion at vegetated and non-vegetated channel bends Water Resources Bulletin 31 983-990
[2]  
Doyle PF(1994)A framework for regional agroecosystems characterization using the national resources inventory Journal of Environmental Quality 23 866-874
[3]  
Burkhart MR(2005)Dynamic modeling for linear erosion initiation and development under climate and land-use changes in northern Laos Catena 63 318-328
[4]  
Oberle SL(2002)Streambank and vegetation response to simulated cattle grazing Wetlands 22 139-148
[5]  
Hewitt MJ(2009)Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction III: assessing phosphorus and sediment reduction potential Environmental Management 43 69-83
[6]  
Picklus J(2010)Natural riparian forest buffers with and without planted grass filters as buffers of concentrated flow from row crop fields Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46 311-322
[7]  
Chaplot V(2004)Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: a review Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59 43-50
[8]  
Giboire G(2003)Gully erosion and environmental change: Importance and research needs Catena 50 91-133
[9]  
Marchand P(2000)Channel instability in the Loess area of the Midwestern United States Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36 133-150
[10]  
Valentin C(1957)Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38 913-920