The long and short of a DNA-damage response

被引：0
|
作者：
Antonio Conconi
Brendan Bell
机构：
[1] Faculty of Medicine,Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease
[2] Université de Sherbrooke,undefined
[3] Sherbrooke,undefined
来源：
Nature | 2017年 / 545卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Ultraviolet light can damage DNA, triggering a general shutdown of gene transcription — yet some genes are activated by UV light. An investigation of this counter-intuitive behaviour reveals a surprising gene-regulation mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码：165 / 166
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MOLECULAR BIOLOGY The long and short of a DNA-damage response
    Conconi, Antonio
    Bell, Brendan
    NATURE, 2017, 545 (7653) : 165 - 166
  • [2] DNA viruses and the cellular DNA-damage response
    Turnell, Andrew S.
    Grand, Roger J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2012, 93 : 2076 - 2097
  • [3] Oxygen sensing and the DNA-damage response
    Hammond, Ester M.
    Kaufmann, Muriel R.
    Giaccia, Amato J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2007, 19 (06) : 680 - 684
  • [4] RasiRNAs hush the DNA-damage response
    不详
    CELL, 2007, 128 (03) : 419 - 419
  • [5] ENHANCED MELANOGENESIS AS A RESPONSE TO DNA-DAMAGE
    ELLER, MS
    OSTROM, K
    GILCHREST, BA
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 104 (04) : 581 - 581
  • [6] DNA-damage response - Chewing at the ends
    Alderton, Gemma K.
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12) : 942+943 - 943
  • [7] Functional genomics of the yeast DNA-damage response
    Gerard Cagney
    David Alvaro
    Robert JD Reid
    Peter H Thorpe
    Rodney Rothstein
    Nevan J Krogan
    Genome Biology, 7
  • [8] Oncogenic tyrosine kinases and the dna-damage response
    Tomasz Skorski
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2002, 2 : 351 - 360
  • [9] A role for proapoptotic BID in the DNA-damage response
    Zinkel, SS
    Hurov, KE
    Ong, C
    Abtahl, FM
    Gross, A
    Korsmeyer, SJ
    CELL, 2005, 122 (04) : 579 - 591
  • [10] Oncogenic tyrosine kinases and the DNA-damage response
    Skorski, T
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (05) : 351 - 360
12345