Civil Society Capacity Building for Democratic Reform: Experience and Lessons from Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Hans Antlöv
Derick W. Brinkerhoff
Elke Rapp
机构
[1] RTI International,
来源
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations | 2010年 / 21卷
关键词
Democratization; Governance; Civil society; NGOs; Indonesia; Capacity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines civil society strengthening experience in Indonesia to illuminate issues, challenges, and lessons for non-governmental organization (NGO) capacity building and international donor-supported democratic reform. The authors conceive of capacity as a function of contextual factors, and internal factors associated with an individual NGO or a network of NGOs. Contextual factors that need to be taken into account in Indonesia include weak reform implementation, state distrust of NGOs, and backsliding on some basic freedoms. Among the important internal features of NGOs in democracy promotion are overreliance on confrontational advocacy strategies, shallow organizational capacity, inability to cooperate to leverage impact, limited outreach to indigenous constituencies and sustainability problems. Indonesia’s democracy-promotion NGO coalitions have largely operated as instruments of donor-supported reforms. As they seek to become socially embedded actors pursuing indigenous agendas, they face the need to confront the various expectations of their stakeholders regarding their roles and legitimacy, develop flexibility to respond to new engagements with government and with citizens, and address their internal capacity gaps. Three cases are presented that illustrate both the problems and the encouraging progress with government–NGO collaborations in democratic governance.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 439
页数:22
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Blair H(2004)Assessing civil society impact for democracy programs: Using an advocacy scale in Indonesia and the Philippines Democratization 11 77-103
[2]  
Brinkerhoff JM(2002)Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes, and new directions Public Administration and Development 22 3-19
[3]  
Brinkerhoff DW(1998)A model and typology of government-NGO relationships Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 27 358-382
[4]  
Coston JM(2004)Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: A critique of neo-institutionalist perspectives Development and Change 35 697-718
[5]  
Hadiz VR(2002)History in the making: A systemic transition in Indonesia Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 7 1-19
[6]  
Mishra S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined