High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:0
|
作者
E. Patterson
P. Stokes
D. Cutajar
A. Rosenfeld
J. Baines
P. Metcalfe
M. Powers
机构
[1] University of Wollongong,Centre of Medical and Radiation Physics
[2] University of Wollongong,Illawarra Health Medical Research Institute
[3] Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research,Townsville Cancer Centre
[4] Townsville Hospital and Health Service,College of Science and Engineering
[5] James Cook University,undefined
来源
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine | 2023年 / 46卷
关键词
MR-linac; Elekta Unity; MOSFET; Skin dose; Surface dosimetry; Monte Carlo;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin™, for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin™ entry surface doses, relative to Dmax, were (9.9 ± 0.2)%, (10.1 ± 0.3)%, (11.3 ± 0.6)%, (12.9 ± 1.0)%, and (13.4 ± 1.0)% for 1 × 1 cm2, 3 × 3 cm2, 5 × 5 cm2, 10 × 10 cm2, and 22 × 22 cm2 fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin™ measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 × 10 cm2 field size using the MOSkin™ and 17.9% for the 22 × 22 cm2 field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin™ detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 800
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scintillation imaging as a high-resolution, remote, versatile 2D detection system for MR-linac quality assurance
    Alexander, Daniel A.
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Bruza, Petr
    Pogue, Brian W.
    Gladstone, David J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (09) : 3861 - 3869
  • [42] MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning
    Michel Chea
    Mathilde Croisé
    Christelle Huet
    Céline Bassinet
    Mohamed-Amine Benadjaoud
    Catherine Jenny
    Radiation Oncology, 19
  • [43] Technical Note: Investigating the impact of field size on patient selection for the 1.5T MR-Linac
    Chuter, Robert W.
    Whitehurst, Philip
    Choudhury, Ananya
    van Herk, Marcel
    McWilliam, Alan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (11) : 5667 - 5671
  • [44] 1.5 T MR-linac planning study to compare two different strategies of rectal boost irradiation
    Bonomo, Pierluigi
    Lo Russo, Monica
    Nachbar, Marcel
    Boeke, Simon
    Gatidis, Sergios
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Gani, Cihan
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 26 : 86 - 91
  • [45] Repeatability of abdominal DWI using different motion compensation techniques on a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Baas, Koen P. A.
    Visser, Sabine
    van Pelt, Vivian W. J.
    McHugh, Damien J.
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Wetscherek, Andreas
    Schakel, Tim
    Kruiskamp, Marijn
    Wang, Jihong
    Nowee, Marlies E.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Paulson, Eric S.
    van Houdt, Petra J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3859 - S3862
  • [46] Geometric end-to-end accuracy determination of the online adaptive workflow on the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Oolbekkink, Stijn
    Wolthaus, Jochem W. H.
    van Asselen, Bram
    Kalaitzakis, Georgios I.
    Pappas, Evangelos
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4749 - S4751
  • [47] Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in central nervous system tumours on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Chan, Rachel W.
    Lawrence, Liam S. P.
    Oglesby, Ryan T.
    Chen, Hanbo
    Stewart, James
    Theriault, Aimee
    Campbell, Mikki
    Ruschin, Mark
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Atenafu, Eshetu G.
    Keller, Brian
    Chugh, Brige
    MacKenzie, Scott
    Tseng, Chia-Lin
    Detsky, Jay
    Maralani, Pejman J.
    Czarnota, Greg J.
    Stanisz, Greg J.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Lau, Angus Z.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : 140 - 149
  • [48] Time-course assessment of 3D-image distortion on the 1.5 T Marlin/Elekta Unity MR-LINAC
    Damyanovich, Andrei Z.
    Tadic, Tony
    Foltz, Warren D.
    Jelveh, Salomeh
    Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 100 : 90 - 98
  • [49] Time-course assessment of 3D-image distortion on the 1.5 T Marlin/Elekta Unity MR-LINAC
    Damyanovich, Andrei Z.
    Tadic, Tony
    Foltz, Warren D.
    Jelveh, Salomeh
    Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 100 : 90 - 98
  • [50] Characterization of an MR-compatible motion platform for quality assurance of motion-compensated treatments on the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Oolbekkink, Stijn
    Borman, Pim T. S.
    Wolthaus, Jochem W. H.
    van Asselen, Bram
    van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
    Dunn, Stephanie
    Koenig, Grant R.
    Hartman, Nick
    Kheirkhah, Niusha
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Fast, Martin F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,