Advances in the Fabrication of Scaffold and 3D Printing of Biomimetic Bone Graft

被引:1
作者
Bharti Bisht
Ashley Hope
Anubhab Mukherjee
Manash K. Paul
机构
[1] University of California Los Angeles (UCLA),School of Thoracic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine
[2] UCLA,Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology
[3] Esperer Onco Nutrition Pvt. Ltd.,Pulmonary Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine
[4] UCLA,undefined
来源
Annals of Biomedical Engineering | 2021年 / 49卷
关键词
3D printing; Bone; Tissue engineering; Scaffold; Bone graft;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The need for bone grafts is tremendous, and that leads to the use of autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes. The biology of the bone is quite complex regarding cellular composition and architecture, hence developing a mineralized connective tissue graft is challenging. Traditionally used bone graft substitutes including metals, biomaterial coated metals and biodegradable scaffolds, suffer from persistent limitations. With the advent and rise of additive manufacturing technologies, the future of repairing bone trauma and defects seems to be optimistic. 3D printing has significant advantages, the foremost of all being faster manipulation of various biocompatible materials and live cells or tissues into the complex natural geometries necessary to mimic and stimulate cellular bone growth. The advent of new-generation bioprinters working with high-precision, micro-dispensing and direct digital manufacturing is aiding in ground-breaking organ and tissue printing, including the bone. The future bone replacement for patients holds excellent promise as scientists are moving closer to the generation of better 3D printed bio-bone grafts that will be safer and more effective. This review aims to summarize the advances in scaffold fabrication techniques, emphasizing 3D printing of biomimetic bone grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1150
页数:22
相关论文
共 877 条
[1]  
Abbah SA(2012) bioactivity of rhBMP-2 delivered with novel polyelectrolyte complexation shells assembled on an alginate microbead core template J. Control. Release 162 364-372
[2]  
Liu J(2010)Fabrication and characterization of poly( J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 94 137-145
[3]  
Lam RWM(2015), Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 94 53-62
[4]  
Goh JCH(2016)-lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration Biologia 71 353-366
[5]  
Wong HK(2019)Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair Bioactive Mater. 4 22-36
[6]  
Aboudzadeh N(2009)Scaffolds from biomaterials: Advantages and limitations in bone and tissue engineering Materials 2 790-832
[7]  
Imani M(2012)A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications Acta Biomater. 8 2466-2475
[8]  
Shokrgozar MA(2009)Metallic Scaffolds for bone regeneration Curr. Chem. Biol. 3 203-230
[9]  
Khavandi A(2000)Acidic peptide hydrogel scaffolds enhance calcium phosphate mineral turnover into bone tissue Cell Struct. Funct. 25 73-84
[10]  
Javadpour J(2019)Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan J. Orthop. Trauma 33 203-213