Maximal oxygen uptake of Italian firefighters: Laboratory vs. field evaluations

被引:0
|
作者
Perroni F. [1 ,2 ]
Cortis C. [3 ,4 ]
Minganti C. [3 ,5 ]
Cignitti L. [2 ]
Capranica L. [3 ]
机构
[1] University of Turin, P.za Bernini, 12, Turin
[2] Italian Firefighters Corp, Rome
[3] Department of Human Movement and Sport Science, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome
[4] Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino e Lazio Meridionale, Cassino
[5] Department of Medical Sciences and Surgery, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro
关键词
Firefighters; Maximal oxygen uptake; Self-contained breathing apparatus;
D O I
10.1007/s11332-013-0142-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the aerobic power of firefighters evaluated by means of laboratory and field tests. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) of 15 Italian male firefighters (age: 31 ± 6 years; BMI: 24.7 ± 2.1) was compared during a graded incremental treadmill test to exhaustion and an endurance field test (Queen's College step test) performed with and without wearing the protective clothing and the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) conditions. A 2 (conditions: with vs. without SCBA) × 2 (test setting: laboratory vs. field) ANOVA for repeated measures was used to verify significant differences (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. Despite differences (p < 0.01) emerged between Queen's College step test with SCBA values and the other tests, no significant correlations were observed. The evaluation of fitness level is important to avoid the risks of job-related injuries, ensuring that physically capable personnel could perform this crucial public safety occupation. Thus, the present results demonstrate that specific fitness tests should be used for monitoring changes in firefighter's health status and for guiding their training programme and that a periodic evaluation of firefighters can be performed in easy and accurate manner. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope (oues): Maximal Vs. Submaximal Calculation Methods
    Ehrman, Jonathan K.
    Kraus, William E.
    Piner, Lucy W.
    Leifer, Eric S.
    Saval, Matthew A.
    Keteyian, Steven J.
    Brawner, Clinton A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 573 - 574
  • [2] Field vs. Laboratory Usability Evaluations: a Study on a Context Dependent Mobile Application Developed with an Agile Methodology
    Lopez, J. M.
    Urretavizcaya, M.
    Losada, B.
    Fernandez, I.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 14 (01) : 339 - 348
  • [3] Peak oxygen uptake in a sprint interval testing protocol vs. maximal oxygen uptake in an incremental testing protocol and their relationship with cross-country mountain biking performance
    Hebisz, Rafal
    Hebisz, Paulina
    Zaton, Marek
    Michalik, Kamil
    APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2017, 42 (04) : 371 - 376
  • [4] Oxygen vs. age and metallicity in halo field stars
    Laird, JB
    THIRD STROMLO SYMPOSIUM: THE GALACTIC HALO, 1999, 165 : 248 - 253
  • [5] Laboratory vs. field measurement endpoints: a contaminated sediment perspective
    Ankley, GT
    ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS, 1997, : 115 - 122
  • [6] Weathering of a Nonwoven Polypropylene Geotextile: Field vs. Laboratory Exposure
    Carneiro, Jose Ricardo
    Lopes, Maria de Lurdes
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (22)
  • [7] Field vs. Laboratory Polymer-Retention Values for a Polymer Flood in the Tambaredjo Field
    Manichand, R. N.
    Seright, R. S.
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2014, 17 (03) : 314 - 325
  • [8] Laboratory vs. Field Calibration of HydraSCOUT Probes for Soil Water Measurement
    Tfwala, Cinisani M.
    van Rensburg, Leon D.
    Bello, Zaid A.
    Zietsman, Pieter C.
    PEDOSPHERE, 2019, 29 (01) : 132 - 136
  • [9] Accelerometer Cut Points For Physical Activity: Mets Vs. Oxygen Uptake Reserve
    Ballenger, Brantley K.
    Schultz, Emma E.
    Driskill, Matthew
    Motl, Robert W.
    Agiovlasitis, Stamatis
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 400 - 400
  • [10] Laboratory vs. Field Calibration of HydraSCOUT Probes for Soil Water Measurement
    Cinisani M.TFWALA
    Leon D.van RENSBURG
    Zaid A.BELLO
    Pieter C.ZIETSMAN
    Pedosphere, 2019, (01) : 132 - 136