Aortic roots assessment by an automated three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: an intra-individual comparison

被引:0
作者
Minghui Zhang
Linyuan Wan
Kun Liu
Weichun Wu
Hui Li
Yuan Wang
Bin Lu
Hao Wang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Department of Echocardiography, Fuwai Hospital
[2] National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,Department of Radiologic Imaging, Fuwai Hospital
[3] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital
[4] National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,undefined
[5] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,undefined
[6] National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,undefined
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2019年 / 35卷
关键词
Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography; Multidetector computed tomography; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Automated measurement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the accuracy, reproducibility, and transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing efficiency of an automated 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic (3D-TEE) post-processing software in the assessments of aortic roots, intra-individually compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). We prospectively studied 67 patients with normal aortic roots. We measured diameters of aortic annulus (AA), sinus of Valsalva (SOV), and sino-tubular junction (STJ) by full-automated and semi-automated methods using 3D-TEE datasets, then compared them to corresponding transthoracic echocardiography and MDCT values. THV sizes were chosen based on echocardiography and MDCT measurements according to recommended criterion. Taking MDCT planimetered diameters as reference, the full-automated (r: 0.4745–0.8792) and semi-automated (r: 0.6647–0.8805) 3D-TEE measurements were linearly correlated (p < 0.0001). The average differences between semi-automated or full-automated measurements and reference were 0.3 mm or 1.3 mm for AA, − 1.9 mm or − 0.5 mm for SOV, and − 0.1 mm or 1.9 mm for STJ, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients of semi-automated method were 0.79–0.96 (intra-observer) and 0.75–0.92 (inter-observer). THV sizing by semi-automated measurements using echocardiographic criteria was larger than that by MDCT measurements using MDCT criteria (p < 0.0001) but equivalent (p > 0.05) if both using MDCT standards. The new automated 3D-TEE software allows modeling and quantifying aortic roots with high reproducibility. Measurements by the semi-automated method closely approximate and well correlate with the corresponding MDCT, thus THV sizing by this modeled 3D-TEE measurements should adopt recommended MDCT criteria but not echocardiographic criteria. The full-automated 3D-TEE segmentations are yet immature. (Semi-automated assessMent of Aortic Roots by Three-dimensional transEsophageal echocaRdiography [SMARTER], NCT02724709)
引用
收藏
页码:2029 / 2036
页数:7
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Giannini F(2018)Transcatheter valve replacement in Asia Pacific: current practice and perspectives J Am Coll Cardiol 72 3189-3199
[2]  
Baldetti L(2017)Impact of methodologic differences in three-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the aortic annulus compared with computed tomographic angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30 414-421
[3]  
Gallone G(2017)ACR appropriateness criteria((R)) imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement J Am Coll Radiol 14 S449-S455
[4]  
Khalique OK(2017)Multimodality imaging for planning and follow-up of transcatheter aortic valve replacement Can J Cardiol 33 1110-1123
[5]  
Hamid NB(2019)Intermodality variation of aortic dimensions: how, where and when to measure the ascending aorta Int J Cardiol 276 230-235
[6]  
White JM(2016)Multimodality imaging strategies for the assessment of aortic stenosis: Viewpoint of the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) group Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9 e4352-24
[7]  
Leipsic JA(2019)Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12 1-162
[8]  
Blanke P(2019)Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12 149-327
[9]  
Hanley M(2018)Superiority of novel automated assessment of aortic annulus by intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: comparison with conventional cross-sectional assessment J Cardiol 72 321-46
[10]  
Soon J(2012)EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25 3-778