Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

被引:64
作者
Romanini E. [1 ]
D'Angelo F. [1 ]
De Masi S. [1 ]
Adriani E. [1 ]
Magaletti M. [1 ]
Lacorte E. [1 ]
Laricchiuta P. [1 ]
Sagliocca L. [1 ]
Morciano C. [1 ]
Mele A. [1 ]
机构
[1] GLOBE, Gruppo di Lavoro Ortopedia Basata su Prove di Efficacia, Rome
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); Evidence-based guideline; Systematic review; Knee;
D O I
10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons in selecting the optimal graft for ACL reconstruction using an evidence-based approach. A monodisciplinary panel was formed to define a restricted number of clinical questions, develop specific search strategies and critically appraise the literature using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. The final draft was shared by the panel and then sent to four external referees to assess its readability and clarity, its clinical relevance and the feasibility of recommendations. autograft shows moderate superiority compared with allograft, in relation to the relevant outcomes and the quality of selected evidence, after an appropriate risk-benefit assessment. Allograft shows higher failure rate and higher risk of infection. The panel recommends use of autografts; patellar tendon should be the first choice, due to its higher stability, while use of hamstring is indicated for subjects for whom knee pain can represent a particular problem (e.g., some categories of workers). autograft shows better performance compared with allograft and no significant heterogeneity in relation to relevant outcomes. The GRADE method allowed collation of all the information needed to draw up the recommendations, and to highlight the core points for discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:8
相关论文
共 158 条
[1]  
Mountcastle SB(2007)Gender differences in anterior cruciate ligament injury vary with activity: epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a young, athletic population Am J Sports Med 35 1635-1642
[2]  
Posner M(2003)Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American academy of orthopedic surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury Arthroscopy 19 762-770
[3]  
Kragh JF(2004)Current practice in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the United Kingdom Br J Sports Med 38 542-544
[4]  
Taylor DC(2007)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 7 10-1051
[5]  
Marx RG(2008)Going from evidence to recommendations BMJ 336 1049-926
[6]  
Jones EC(2008)GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 924-998
[7]  
Angel M(2008)What is the “quality of evidence” and why is it important for the clinicians BMJ 336 995-1173
[8]  
Wickiewicz TL(2008)Incorporating considerations of resources use into grade recommendations BMJ 336 1170-1110
[9]  
Warren RF(2008)Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic test and strategies BMJ 336 1106-257
[10]  
Kapoor B(2004)Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 328 1490-11