Promotion of Egg Production Rate and Quality Using Limosilactobacillus oris BSLO 1801, a Potential Probiotic Screened from Feces of Laying Hens with Higher Egg Productive Performance

被引:0
作者
Zhiqiang Wan
Ning Sun
Min Luo
Baoxing Gan
Zhipeng Yao
Xi Cao
Hesong Wang
Kangcheng Pan
Gang Shu
Yan Zeng
Dong Zeng
Xueqin Ni
机构
[1] Sichuan Agricultural University,Animal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine
[2] Nanfang Hospital,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province
[3] Southern Medical University,undefined
来源
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
Laying hens; Gut microbiome; High-throughput sequencing; Probiotics; Laying hens;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this experiment, laying hens were divided into a high productive group (group H) and a low productive group (group L). The purpose of this experiment was to screen and isolate a potential probiotic associated with the laying rate from group H by comparing the results via 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. The high-throughput sequencing analysis results showed that there were some differences in the composition of the gut microbiome between groups H and L on the Phylum and Genus levels. Through isolation and identification, we screened 16 lactobacilli strains. Among the 16 strains, S5 showed good acid tolerance, bile salt tolerance, and cholesterol degradation. Therefore, we chose strain S5 (identified as Limosilactobacillus oris, named Limosilactobacillus oris BSLO 1801) as a potential probiotic to promote the productivity of ordinary laying hens. During the animal experiment, 288 Hy-line white hens (30 weeks old) were divided into four groups, with six replications (n = 12) per group. The control group received the basic diet, and the treatment groups received the same basic diet supplemented with 107 CFU/kg, 108 CFU/kg, and 109 CFU/kg of BSLO 1801. The laying hens were acclimated to the environment for 1 week before the initiation of the experiment. Dietary supplementation with 107 CFU/kg and 109 CFU/kg of BSLO 1801 increased the laying rate significantly, and the potential probiotic improved the egg weight in all treatment groups. Additionally, the cholesterol content of the yolk dropped significantly in the 109 CFU/kg group, and the weight of egg yolk was significantly increased in all treatment groups. However, no significant differences in eggshell strength, eggshell thickness, protein height, and Haugh unit were observed among the four groups. These results revealed that lactobacilli spp. are important bacteria of the intestinal microbiome in highly productive laying hens, and BSLO 1801 was isolated as a potential probiotic. Through these animal experiments, we also found that adding BSLO 1801 to the basic diet of laying hens could effectively improve the laying rate, average egg weight, and yolk weight and reduce the cholesterol content in egg yolk.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 547
页数:12
相关论文
共 211 条
[1]  
Barko PC(2017)The gastrointestinal microbiome: a review J Vet Intern Med 32 9-25
[2]  
Mcmichael M(2018)Probiotic species in the modulation of gut microbiota: an overview Biomed Res Int 2018 9478630-65
[3]  
Swanson KS(2010)A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing Nature 464 59-12
[4]  
Williams DA(2017)Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health Nutrients 9 1-343
[5]  
Azad M(2017)Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization Anim Nutr 3 331-3815
[6]  
Sarker M(2018)Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry Poult Sci 97 3807-1346
[7]  
Li T(2018) probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production J Appl Microbiol 124 1334-2902
[8]  
Yin J(2015)An introduction to the avian gut microbiota and the effects of yeast-based prebiotic-type compounds as potential feed additives Front Vet Sci 2 28-631
[9]  
Qin J(2009)Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants Environ Pollut 157 2893-1888
[10]  
Li R(2003)Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production Poult Sci 82 627-615